Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Little league shoulder syndrome in an adolescent cricket player
  1. W R Drescher,
  2. A Falliner,
  3. T Zantop,
  4. K Oehlert,
  5. W Petersen,
  6. J Hassenpflug
  1. Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Kiel, Kiel, Germany
  1. Correspondence to:
 W R Drescher
 Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Kiel, Christian-Albrechts-University, Michaelisstr. 1, D-24105 Kiel, Germany;


The first case of little league shoulder syndrome in a cricket player is reported. The condition has been reported in baseball pitchers and is characterised by a proximal humeral epiphyseolysis.

  • adolescent
  • cricket
  • little league syndrome
  • shoulder

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

A 12 year old male first junior class cricket player presented at our outpatient clinic with a 4 week history of right shoulder pain. Pain occurred for the first time during fast bowling with the right arm and was recurrent. Clinical examination revealed a physiologic active and passive range of motion in both shoulders. No swelling or tender points could be discerned. x Rays of the shoulder joints demonstrated a significant widening of the lateral part of the proximal humeral epiphysis of the right shoulder (fig 1). Treatment consisted of recommending total abstinence from all throwing for 12 weeks and abstinence from fast bowling until closing of the proximal humeral epiphyseal plate.1 After the shoulder pain subsided, the young patient was allowed to resume playing at a different position. The patient was pain free 1 year after the onset of symptoms. Resumption of playing as a fast bowler again was recommended only after closure of the proximal humeral epiphyseal plate.

Figure 1

 The x rays show a widening of the lateral part of the proximal humeral epiphysis in the right shoulder compared to the contralateral side.


To our knowledge, the present paper is the first case report of little league shoulder syndrome in a cricket player. This syndrome has previously been described in adolescent baseball pitchers.2

In an overview of injuries in the young athlete, the proximal humerus is an uncommon site of injury.3 A case of a slipped capital humeral epiphysis with radiologic physeal irregularities similar to those of little league shoulder syndrome has been reported in a gymnast.4 Little league elbow has been described as fragmentation and partial avulsion of the medial humeral epicondyle.5 Little league elbow occurs in throwing and racquet sports which produce large stresses at the elbow joint including tension on the ulnar side and compression on the radial side.

The throwing mechanism of baseball or cricket ball players, as required by fast bowlers, is a whip-like activity of the arm which places repetitive traction strain on the shoulder and elbow joints.1 The proximal humeral growth plate of the young person is at high risk for epiphysiolysis because it consists of cartilage, and an impulse of the whole arm exerts strain at this weak location.

In cricket, injury prevalence has been reported to be highest for pace bowlers (14%), while being 4% for spin bowlers, 4% for batsmen, and 2% for wicket keepers in Australian cricket at first class level.6 The most common injuries were hamstring strains, side strains, groin injuries, wrist and hand injuries, and lumbar soft tissue injuries.7 In a longitudinal study in 436 elite cricket players, injuries occurred in the lower limbs (49.8%), upper limbs (23.3%), and the back and trunk (22.8%).8 Acute injuries made up 64.8%.

Concerning treatment, Adams recognised the traumatic nature of the condition and showed that rapid recovery was achieved by rest.1 In a 13 year old baseball pitcher, treatment with 3 weeks of immobilisation in a sling and abstinence from all throwing for the following 12 weeks led to an asymptomatic condition after 2 years.2 As early mobilisation of the shoulder joint is favoured today,9 the authors preferred not to immobilise the shoulder of the above patient in a sling. Other authors have also refrained from immobilisation and have treated the condition only with rest, allowing the adolescent baseball player to resume playing at other positions but not to pitch again until closing of the epiphyses.1 No case has hitherto been reported in which little league shoulder was operatively managed.

The primary goal of sports physicians, parents, and coaches is to protect young cricket players from injuries. Recommendations for protecting young baseball pitchers from shoulder injuries include resistance exercises and a throwing program with a long toss component as well as post throwing scapular stabilisation and rotator cuff exercises.10 Many young athletes lack adequate muscular strength to dynamically stabilise the shoulder.10 Pitch counts and soreness rules may further limit maximum effort.10

In conclusion, this case report shows that evaluation of shoulder pain in the young throwing athlete should always include a high index of suspicion for growth plate injury.



  • Conflict of interest: none declared.

Linked Articles

  • Miscellanea
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine