Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Changes in joint position sense after surgically treated chronic lateral ankle instability
  1. T Halasi,
  2. Á Kynsburg,
  3. A Tállay,
  4. I Berkes
  1. Department of Sports Surgery, National Institute for Sports Medicine, Budapest, Hungary
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr Halasi
    Department of Sports Surgery, National Institute for Sports Medicine, Budapest 1123, Hungary;


Background: A search of the literature shows that the effect of surgery on ankle proprioception has been hardly investigated.

Objective: To examine the effect of anatomical reconstruction of the anterolateral capsuloligamentous complex on ankle joint position sense.

Methods: A prospective study using the “slope box” test. Ten consecutive patients were included in the study, and 10 healthy athletes represented the control group.

Results: Similar test-retest reliability rates (overall reliability 0.92; p  =  0.0013) were obtained to those of the original designers of the method. There were no significant differences with respect to side dominance (p  =  0.9216). Investigation of the characteristics of mean absolute estimate errors showed that the controls tested became error prone in the range of slope altitudes 7.5–25° in every direction, compared with the range 0–5° (range of p values 0.00003–0.00072). The results of the intervention group showed that, for the two main directions of interest (anterior and lateral), preoperative differences in mean absolute estimate errors between injured (anterior 3.91 (2.81)°; lateral 4.06 (2.85)°) and healthy (anterior 2.94 (2.21)°, lateral 3.19 (2.64)°) sides (anterior, p  =  0.0124; lateral, p  =  0.0250) had disappeared (postoperative differences: anterior, p  =  0.6906; lateral, p  =  0.4491). The afflicted ankle had improved significantly after surgery in both important directions (anterior, p<0.0001; lateral, p  =  0.0023).

Conclusions: The study shows that differences in joint position sense between healthy and injured ankles disappeared as the result of surgery. Preoperative data show that proprioceptive malfunction is a cause of functional instability. If treatment is by means of surgery, the retensioning of the original anterolateral structures is inevitable, even if other grafting or surgical techniques are used.

  • proprioception
  • ankle instability
  • lateral ligaments
  • anatomical reconstruction
  • joint position sense

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Ankle sprain is the most common sports injury, predominantly (85–90%) affecting the lateral ligaments of the ankle. The resulting chronic talocrural instability adversely affects sports performance and often everyday living as well.1–,4 The main causes of the functional instability are mechanical instability, peroneal muscle weakness, and proprioceptive deficit.1,3–,6 It is generally accepted that surgical treatment is only necessary in 10–30% of cases, after unsuccessful conservative treatment.2–4,7–,9

An increasingly popular stabilising surgical procedure is the anatomical reconstruction or delayed repair.2–4,8,9,10,11,12,13 Its advantages are: reproduction of the original anatomical conditions while leaving other structures, especially tendons, unaffected; small incision and little tissue damage; fewer complications; effective stabilisation with less impairment of range of motion compared with other methods.2–4,8,9,10,11,12,13

The modified Broström procedure,14 described by Karlsson et al2 in 1988, involves the shortening, reinsertion, and duplication of the anterolateral ligaments and capsule. There is no clinical evidence, only logical supposition, that this technique must have an effect on the proprioceptive function of the ankle.3,9,10,12 We hypothesised that anatomical reconstruction should improve decreased receptor activity by retensioning slackened lateral structures of the talocrural joint.3

There are numerous accepted methods for the assessment of ankle joint position sense.15 We used the “slope box” test, first applied and described by Robbins et al,16 as its use is very feasible for a clinical study.

The aim of our prospective study was to document the effects of anatomical reconstruction of the anterolateral capsuloligamentous complex on ankle joint position sense.


The slope box test16 was used to assess joint position sense. Eleven wooden platforms with a basal area of 30 × 30 cm were constructed, and covered with slip proof rubber material. The platforms were inclined at angles varying by 2.5° between 0° and 25°. With the four directional rotation of the platforms, there were 4 × 11 testing positions available altogether (fig 1).

Figure 1

 Joint position sense testing with the slope-box test. The subject has given permission for publication of this figure.

Patients were asked to step on to the platforms with one foot, placing their entire weight on that supporting foot. During testing, patients were given glasses darkened on the bottom so that they could not see downwards. To exclude the effects of footwear, all testing was conducted with the subject barefoot (fig 1).

Before testing, patients were informed that their task was to estimate the degree of incline on to which they had stepped, to determine the direction (whether it was outward, inward, forward, or backward—that is, lateral, medial, anterior, or posterior), and to estimate the steepness of the incline on a scale from 0 to 15 (0° to 37.5°), enabling an overestimation of up to 12.5°.

Patients were always tested for all 44 positions in four series of 11. At the beginning, each patient was shown the platforms inclined at 0°, 12.5°, and 25° (inclines 0, 5, and 10 as scaled for patients) for reference. When designing the study, we randomly determined the order in which subjects were presented with the 44 types of incline. This order was then followed exactly for every patient. To eliminate a learning effect, subjects did not see the platforms, did not know the grade of inclination (except for reference), and did not receive any feedback on the accuracy of their guesses. As each subject was tested for both legs, there were 2 × 44 measurements available for each one.

Twenty people participated in the study. Ten patients, belonging to the operative group, were admitted to the Department of Sports Surgery and assigned to the study in random order of arrival. Criteria for inclusion were: elective Karlsson procedure for chronic ankle instability (functional and mechanical); unsuccessful conservative treatment; aged 16–40 years; active in sport; unaffected contralateral ankle. Exclusion criteria were: previous fracture or muscle injury of the lower extremities; previous ankle surgery; known neurological or otological disease; restricted talocrural function; intra-articular lesions of the talocrural joint.

During the study period (March to December 2002), of the 17 patients encountered, 14 met the inclusion criteria, but after exclusions 10 actually remained in the study. The fact that there were equal numbers of men and women (five of each) was due to chance. The first measurements were performed on the day before surgery. The same operative method, described by Karlsson et al,2 was used for all patients. After surgery, patients wore a cast for four weeks. After cast removal, physiotherapy involved only range of motion exercises; no proprioceptive training was provided. We conducted a follow up assessment 6–9 weeks after surgery, when the ankle that had been operated on had regained similar range of motion to the healthy ankle.

The control group contained 10 healthy athletes who were visiting the institute for regular check ups. Criteria for selection and inclusion were: competitive athlete; aged 16–40 years; negative medical history and physical status; equal numbers of men and women.

Exclusion criteria were the same as for the operative group. Healthy controls only took part in one examination, except for the first three who were examined on two consecutive days to test the reliability of the method.

The baseline data of the two groups did not differ significantly (table 1). The dominant side was determined using a ball kicking test.

Table 1

 Baseline data of the control and operative groups

The absolute estimate error, applied to characterise the accuracy of estimating inclinations, is the absolute value of the difference in degrees between the estimated and actual inclination of the platform. The mean absolute estimate error, which enables comparisons within and between groups, also allows comparisons with the results of other researchers on position sense testing.

Subject data were recorded on MS Excel sheets, and data were analysed using Statistica 6.0. The reliability of the method was determined by analysing relative errors in estimation between the first and second tests by the first three control subjects. Relative error is the difference between estimated and actual slope amplitude (inclination) with a positive or negative sign. Final assessment involved repeated reliability analysis, and statistical significance was determined by one way analysis of variance. Otherwise, the comparison of any two groups was based on the absolute errors. For comparison of the estimates made for the same group at two different times, we used a single sample, paired t test with two sided significance. For comparison of the results of two separate groups, we used a two sample, two sided t test. Statistical significance was assumed at p  =  0.05.


The overall reliability of the method was 0.92 (table 2).

Table 2

 Test-retest reliability of the slope box test

The direction of inclination was misjudged 17 times out of 2904 estimates (0.6%). These results were therefore unsuitable for further analysis. The estimate errors (in degrees) in these cases were, however, included in the overall results.

In the control group, we examined the average value of the absolute estimate error with respect to side dominance in relation to inclination in all four directions (combined and separately) and found no significant differences (table 3). There was also no difference between the performance of the men and women. The mean (SD) absolute estimate error was 2.86 (1.89)° in the male subjects and 2.85 (2.09)° in the female subjects (p  =  0.9321). As there were no significant differences in relation to side dominance or sex, we used the results of all 20 healthy ankles in the control group as a baseline for later comparisons (fig 2).

Table 3

 Results of the control group

Figure 2

 Differences in joint position sense function of dominant and non-dominant ankles in the control group. Box and whisker diagram of mean absolute estimate errors with regard to different directions. D, Dominant side; Non-D, non-dominant side.

Figure 3 shows separately in four directions the changes in mean absolute estimate errors in relation to slope amplitudes. Curves running close to each other show no significant differences between dominant and non-dominant ankles. The steepness of all four curve pairs differs vastly below and above 7.5° of inclination. This striking feature in the graphical representation prompted us to examine statistically possible differences between mean absolute estimate errors made in the 0–5° range and the 7.5–25° range. The difference proved to be strongly significant in all directions (table 4). As the mean estimate errors in the control group were larger in the 7.5–25° range, when we were examining the operative group we performed separate statistical analyses in this range.

Table 4

 Comparison of mean absolute estimate errors between two ranges of inclination in the control group

Figure 3

 Characteristics of joint position sense function of dominant and non-dominant ankles in the (A) medial, (B) lateral, (C) posterior, and (D) anterior direction.

Table 5 summarises the results of the operative group throughout the whole range of inclinations. The mean absolute estimate error of the ankle that underwent surgery was significantly larger than that of the healthy ankle. After surgery, the ankle that was operated on improved significantly, while the results of the healthy ankle remained practically unchanged.

Table 5

 Results of the operative group in full range of inclination

When considering the main effect of the surgical procedure—that is, re-establishment of the physiological supportive role of anterolateral structures—two directions (“forward” and “outward”) deserve special attention. The net result of estimate errors in these directions provides more valuable information than overall values. Before surgery, the afflicted ankle showed a significantly higher mean absolute estimate error than the opposite ankle, whereas afterwards there was almost no difference between the two sides (table 5). No similar results were observed in the other two directions.

Figure 4 shows the characteristics of the mean absolute estimate errors in the two important directions on the afflicted ankle. The continuous bold curves represent the preoperative function; mean absolute estimate errors are the highest in these. Dashed bold lines represent the postoperative results; improvement is demonstrated by these curves running well below the continuous bold ones. In the lateral direction, postoperative function proved to be even better in the higher inclinations than that of the control group (displayed by thin continuous lines).

Figure 4

 Preoperative and postoperative joint position sense characteristics of patients treated surgically for lateral ankle instability in the two main directions of interest: anterior (A); lateral (B). A comparison with the results of the control group.

The steepness of all curves on both charts changes similarly at 7.5° of inclination. Because of facts highlighted above, the intervals between 7.5° and 25° allow a more exact comparison excluding the washout effect of the lower ranges of inclination.

Table 6 shows that, in the narrower and more specific interval, the mean absolute estimate error of the operated ankle was significantly (almost a whole degree) larger than that of the healthy ankle in both important directions. The improvement in mean absolute estimate error after surgery was also almost a whole degree in both “forward” and “outward” directions, meaning that the process of normalisation is characteristic of both directions and the improvement is statistically significant.

Table 6

 Results of the operative group in the 7.5–25° range of inclination


It is mainly accepted today that correct proprioceptive sensomotor function of the ankle joint is a key factor in both prevention and treatment of ligament injury and chronic instability.3,4,6,15,17

Ashton-Miller18 defines strict guidelines for all research of this particular problem. He favours tests with weight bearing, reproducing the actual mechanism, such as the one developed by Robbins et al16 and used by us.

Gait, running, and landing movements are of utmost importance with regard to primary and recurrent injuries.18–,20 However, modelling of landing can only be approximately reproduced because of the risk of injury.

Our method enables good modelling of the actual event as the subject transfers full body weight on to the examined leg. The direction and amplitude of the slope applied cannot be seen or anticipated by the subject. This model is of course also a compromise: the surface is even, there is no forward motion, and the speed is less than is characteristic of most sports.15,20 This method has been used previously for the examination of joint position sense.15,18,21 In our experience, its advantage is the simple technical requirements, but it is very time consuming. A fresh injury or reinjury and the absence of normal communicative skills on the part of the subject limit the applicability.

Robbins et al16 found a test-retest reliability of 0.91. This is similar to our data (0.92; table 2). We found no significant difference between mean absolute estimate errors of dominant and non-dominant sides (2.92° v 2.79°) and of men and women (2.86° v 2.85°). This conforms with the findings of other authors on joint position sense testing.15,18,22

There is some disagreement in the literature, however, about the role of proprioceptive malfunction. Glencross and Thornton5 showed significant differences between injured and non-injured ankles with active position replication tests. Their results may lead to the conclusion that residual symptoms are consequences of receptor damage and malfunction of the sensorimotor system.

In conflict with this, Gross23 reported results on active and passive position reproduction, where recurrent ankle injuries did not feature. In the author’s opinion, the reason for this may be a difference that is already present between the two groups (healthy and injured) before the measurements. Thus the proprioceptive malfunction may well be not a consequence of, but a reason for, ankle ligament injuries.

Our results agree at many points with those of Glencross and Thornton.5 Mean absolute estimate errors were higher in the range of steeper slope amplitudes, and the disturbance in joint position sense of the injured side was similarly proved.

There is also much controversy about the legacy of the proprioceptive theory when reviewing studies that used local anaesthesia of the ankle region or ligaments.

Feuerbach et al24 and Hertel et al25 performed a similar series of examinations with ligamentous anaesthesia on healthy ankles. The mean error of joint position sense was not affected adversely by anaesthesia. Konradsen et al20 made complex proprioceptive measurements before and after applying regional local anaesthesia to healthy ankles. They found that passive joint position sense decreased, whereas active position replication was not altered by anaesthesia. They concluded that the negative changes in passive joint position sense confirm the importance of the receptors in the ligaments and joint capsule with regard to this sensory function. However, the unaltered active joint position replication function underlined the compensating potentials of muscle and tendon receptors. In our study we only examined and confirmed the role of the sensory side of the proprioceptive system.

Konradsen and Magnusson22 published a simple and accurate method for testing active replication of joint position. The study group consisted of 23 recreational athletes, who were considered for surgery for chronic lateral talocrural instability. Significant preoperative differences (affected ankle versus controls; affected versus healthy ankle) established the proprioceptive malfunction of the injured side. This difference between unaffected and injured ankles was also significant in our group before surgery.

The work of Robbins et al16 provides the best basis for comparing basic data, as the technical details of our methods are identical. The only major difference was that the 24 healthy students in the study of Robbins et al wore their own sports shoes whereas in our study measurements were carried out with the subjects barefoot. The mean absolute estimate error was 3.95° before and 4.81° after sporting activity. The reason for the result being worse by about 1° compared with our controls cannot be readily identified, but in their previous studies, in which testing was carried out with the subjects barefoot, they report a much better mean absolute estimate error of 1.96°.

Robbins et al chose the range of slope amplitudes of 10° and above (where mean absolute estimate errors were higher) as the range of increased injury proneness, and used these data for further analysis. In our statistical analysis, however, we used 7.5°, which is a more accurate threshold, as differences between two sets of slope amplitudes are the most significant at this point.

The aim of our study was to provide evidence for the effectiveness of surgery on ankle joint position sense. No similar studies are available in the literature. A change in proprioceptive function through the retensioning of the anterolateral structures can only be expected after anatomical reconstructions (also known as delayed repairs). One particular method of this kind is the Karlsson procedure, which was also performed in the investigated cases. Curiously, the author of the technique did not mention in any of his numerous publications the possible positive proprioceptive effect of this type of surgery.2,7,8,26

Ahlgren and Larsson,10 Liu and Jacobson,12 Williams,9 and Mann et al3 suggested that the beneficial proprioceptive effect of surgery may be the reason for the excellent functional results. These conclusions, stated by independent surgeons using similar surgical methods, were based mainly on already verified anatomical evidence. Lephart et al17 also stated that there was enough physiological and anatomical evidence to support this theory.

What is already known on this topic

  • Ankle sprain is the most common sports injury, affecting sports performance and everyday living

  • Surgery is only necessary if conservative treatment is unsuccessful, but the effect of surgery on ankle proprioception has been hardly investigated

Takebayashi et al27 reported the presence of tension sensitive receptors in the lateral ankle ligaments, and mapped them exactly. According to these authors, the presence of the mechanoreceptors supports the theory that, after ligamentous injury, there is a disturbance in the proprioceptive afferentation, which causes a lack of effector-answer on sudden inversion. They also concluded that, of the surgical procedures available, those that preserve the integrity of ligamentous detachments should be selected, as the density of the receptors is much greater in this area.

In our study, we performed measurements on patients chosen for anatomical reconstruction. Summarising all directions, the afflicted side showed a significant improvement in mean absolute estimate errors compared with its preoperative joint position sense function. The main aim of surgery is the retensioning of the anterolateral structures. Because of the previously described mechanoreceptors, actual changes may only occur in supination and plantarflexion. As we excluded all potentially disturbing circumstances, differences between the two measurements must be interpreted as an effect of the surgical intervention. More detailed analysis shows that significant changes only occurred in two directions—anterior and lateral—both combined and separately. In the two other, theoretically unimportant, planes there were no major changes. The postoperative results for the affected side matched averages of both the healthy contralateral ankles and the control group. The study thus confirms that the preoperative differences in joint position sense function between the healthy and injured ankles had disappeared as the result of surgery.

Our results lead to two further important conclusions. Before surgery, the mean absolute estimate errors for the afflicted ankle were significantly larger than for the healthy ankle, and this difference was observed on lateral and anterior slopes. This shows that proprioceptive malfunction has a role in the development of chronic ankle instability. Disturbed joint position sense function is thus a causative factor of functional instability.

If treatment is by means of surgery, reconstruction and retensioning of the anterolateral structures is inevitable. This means that, even if any other kind of surgery is performed or any other kind of grafting is applied for mechanical stabilisation, anatomical reconstruction of the capsule and the ligaments must be carried out simultaneously. In the case of tendoplasties and periosteal-flap plasties, this technical addition is very simple, and will improve functional results, especially from the athlete’s point of view.

What this study adds

  • Differences in joint position sense between healthy and injured ankles disappeared as the result of surgery

  • Data obtained before surgery show that proprioceptive malfunction is a cause of functional instability



  • Competing interests: none declared