Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
EVALUATION OF PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT FOR PREVENTION OF INJURIES IN RUGBY UNION
Background: The use of protective equipment to decrease the incidence and severity of injuries in rugby union requires further investigation.
Research question/s: How effective is protective equipment in reducing the risk of injuries in rugby union?
Subjects: 304 rugby players.
Experimental procedure: All of the players were assessed pre-season (questionnaire, anthropometry, fitness) and then followed weekly during a club season to assess protective equipment use (expressed as % player weeks used), participation in rugby, and injury outcomes.
Measures of outcome: Rate of all injuries (adjusting for covariates such as level of competition, playing position, and injury history) and selected injuries (mouthguard (MG) – teeth, mouth, and jaw injuries; shin guard (SG) – lower leg laceration, abrasion, contusion; padded headgear (PH) – concussion and other scalp abrasions or contusions; taping (TP) – body areas; head tape (HT) – scalp and auricular injury; support sleeve (SS) – sprain to upper limb, knee ankle; grease (GR) – scalp and auricular injury).
MG appeared to lower the risk of orofacial injury (rate ratio (RR) = 0.56, 95%CI 0.07 to 4.63), PH tended to prevent damage to the scalp and ears (RR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.86), SS tended to reduce the risk of sprains and strains (RR = 0.58, …