You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Short report
High school rugby players’ understanding of concussion and return to play guidelines
  1. Garry Sye1,
  2. S John Sullivan2,
  3. Paul McCrory3
  1. 1Kennedy Road Physiotherapy, Napier, New Zealand
  2. 2University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
  3. 3University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor Sullivan
 University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; sjohn.sullivan{at}otago.ac.nz

Abstract

Objective: To document high school players’ understanding and attitudes towards concussion return to play guidelines.

Methods: A questionnaire based survey was performed of national high school rugby players as to their knowledge of existing concussion return to play guidelines.

Results: A total of 600 male players were surveyed, and 477 responded (response rate 80%). Half (237/477) were aware of concussion guidelines, and 60% (288/477) identified the mandated stand down period that is part of the regulations governing rugby football. Players obtained their information primarily from: teachers/coaches (239 responses), medical personnel (200), and other players (116). Of those players who suspected that they had been concussed (296/477, 62%), only 66 returned to play after medical clearance.

Conclusions and implications: This sample of high school players showed a limited knowledge of the concussion guidelines covering their sport, and even when concussed did not follow recommended protocols. This indicates the need for an increased focus on player education.

  • rugby
  • schoolboy
  • concussion
  • guidelines
  • return to play

https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2005.020511

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests: None declared.