Statistics from Altmetric.com
No effect of a graded training programme on the number of running-related injuries in novice runners
▸ Buist I, Bredeweg SW, van Mechelen W, et al. Am J Sports Med 2008;36:33–9.
Distance running is associated with a risk of developing a running-related injury — risk factors for these injuries include training errors, with a rapid increase in running volume as a common “training error”.
Is a graded training programme for novice runners associated with a reduced risk of running injury when compared with a standard training programme?
Subjects: 352 injury-free (no injury in last 3 months) novice (no running in previous 12 months) runners (39.8 (SD 10.1) years, female = 57.5%) who were preparing for a recreational 6.7 km running event.
Experimental procedure: All the subjects underwent baseline assessment, and were then randomly (stratified for injury history, gender, sporting activity) assigned to either a standard 8 week training programme (CON = 268) or a graded, 13 week training programme (TR = 264, increasing training by no more than 10% per week — 10% rule). Subjects were followed for 8 and 13 weeks respectively, and running-related injuries (defined as any musculoskeletal complaint of the lower extremity or back causing a restriction of running for at least 1 week) as well as training hours were recorded using an internet-based system with email reminders.
Measures of outcome: Injuries per 1000 h running.
There was no significant difference in the incidence of running-related injuries between the …
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.