Objective: To determine if there is a gender difference in the incidence and outcomes of sport concussion.
Design: Critical literature review of sport concussion by gender.
Intervention: PubMed and major sports medicine journals were reviewed using the keywords concussion and gender. Articles included in this paper were English prospective surveillance that included concussion as an injury option conducted over the past 10 years, involved data collected by qualified medical personnel (athletic trainers/therapists or medical doctors) and used injury rates as opposed to raw counts. Only data from sports (soccer, basketball and ice hockey) where actions, equipment and most rules were similar between genders were reviewed.
Results: For the PubMed search, using “concussion” and “gender” as keywords, there were 51 articles. Ten studies (four in football (soccer), four in basketball and two in ice hockey, including high school, college and professional athletes) were included in the incidence portion of the paper. Nine of the studies showed higher absolute injury rates for female concussion compared to their male counterparts with four of them reaching statistical significance. Five of the studies (two football (soccer), two basketball and one ice hockey) examined concussion mechanism and in all cases, males had a higher absolute percent of player contact concussions while females had a higher absolute percentage of surface or ball contact concussion episodes. Two brain injury and four sport concussion outcome papers were reviewed. Traumatic brain injury outcome was shown to be worse in females than in males for a majority of measured variables; females also are shown to have different baseline and post-concussion outcomes on neuropsychological testing.
Conclusions: After evaluating multiple years of concussion data in comparable sports, the evidence indicates that female athletes may be at greater risk for concussion than their male counterparts. There also is some evidence that gender differences exist in outcomes of traumatic brain injury and concussions. Because concussion is a clinical diagnosis often depending on self reporting and with no established biological marker or consistent symptoms/definitions, and because there is evidence that females are more honest in reporting general injuries than males, it is unclear whether the concussion incidence data, while generally consistent in showing a higher risk in females as compared to males in similar sports, is a true difference or is influenced by a reporting bias.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Concussion in sports has received greater attention in the last decade as more is understood about the potential negative performance and health consequences of this injury. Ten years ago, an estimated 300 000 sports-related traumatic brain injuries associated with loss of consciousness occurred annually in the USA.1 2 Given the greater understanding of concussion injury and its symptoms over the past decade, coupled with the significant increase in US and international youth sport participation, this number is significantly larger today. While much of the concussion research has been performed on males, the increasing participation of females in sports around the world warrants an analysis of their risk and response to concussion as well. For example in 2006–7, 42% (almost 3 million) of participating US high school3 and 43% (173 000) of participating NCAA4 student-athletes were female. The purpose of this review is to determine if a gender difference exists in sport concussion risk, symptoms and recovery. If such differences do exist, it raises the question as to whether current return to play guidelines need to consider gender as a specific factor influencing management decisions.
A search of PubMed was performed using the keywords “concussion” and “gender” resulting in 51 articles found. The search was limited to English language publications and human studies. In addition, the main sports medicine journals and associated references were searched for additional papers regarding gender and sport concussion. The title and abstract of these articles were then reviewed by the author. The articles included in the incidence review were prospective surveillance that included concussion as an injury option conducted over the past 10 years, involved data collected by qualified medical personnel (athletic trainers/therapists or medical doctors) and used injury rates as opposed to raw counts. Some studies included injuries that involved no time loss although most required a reportable incident to have at least one day time loss. Only data from football (soccer), basketball and ice hockey were reviewed as these were sports where actions, equipment and most rules were similar between genders. In addition, two brain injury and four sport concussion outcome papers were reviewed.
Ten prospective surveillance studies (four in football (soccer), four in basketball and two in ice hockey), involving high school, college and professional athletes were reviewed (table 1). Football (soccer) and basketball are both sports where action, rules and equipment are similar between genders so these confounding variables were minimised.
Ice hockey is a sport that has similar activities and equipment in the men’s and women’s game with one important rule distinction—intentional body checking is not allowed for females. Since player contact is a primary source of concussion in most sports, eliminating this mechanism implies that the risk of concussion would be significantly reduced in the women’s game.
Nine of the studies showed higher absolute concussion injury rates for females compared to their male counterparts with four of them reaching statistical significance. An example of three college sports is shown in fig 1. In both ice hockey studies, females had an absolute higher but statistically similar rate of concussion compared to their male counterparts despite the prohibition of intentional body checking in the women’s game.
A subset of the above studies reported concussion injury mechanism (table 2). In all cases, males showed an absolute higher percentage of player contact concussions while females showed absolute higher percentages in concussions resulting from contact with the surface or ball. Figures 2, 3 and 4 show specific examples of these results from three college sports.
Gender differences in brain injury outcome
Evidence exists that indicates gender differences in outcomes of traumatic brain injury.
(a) A meta-analysis of eight studies with some limitations due to lack of specifics of individual reports, concluded that traumatic brain injury outcome was worse in women than in men for 85% of the 20 measured variables, which were primarily somatic symptoms such as poor memory, dizziness, fatigue, irritability in response to light and noise, impaired concentration, headache, anxiety and depression.17
(b) Gender has been shown to be an independent predictor of survival following brain injury. Mortality following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury was 1.28 times higher in females than males; furthermore females were 1.57 times more likely to experience poor outcomes (eg, severe disability or persistent vegetative state) than males.18
Specific to sports concussion, limited studies imply that females may be more frequently cognitively impaired than males following concussions. In a study by Broshek et al,19 using 155 concussed high school and college athletes, it was found that female athletes had significantly greater declines in simple and complex reaction times relative to preseason baseline levels, and they reported more post-concussion symptoms compared with age-matched males. As a group, females were cognitively impaired approximately 1.7 times more frequently than males following concussions.
Covassin et al20 evaluated 79 collegiate sport concussions, almost equally distributed across males and females, collected from five universities. They identified post-concussion differences with regard to gender in only one of five cognitive domains of neuropsychological function. Specifically, concussed female athletes demonstrated significantly lower visual memory composite scores compared with male athletes. With respect to post-concussion symptoms, men reported post-concussion vomiting and sadness with greater frequency and intensity than women.
Complicating the post-concussion assessment, a study of over 1200 college age athletes showed that male and female athletes differed on baseline neuropsychological test measures, particularly on verbal and visual memory scores.21 A second study of high school athletes showed gender differences in baseline scores on selected measures of processing speed and executive functions.22
Participation in physical activity offers many lifelong physical and mental benefits for both genders. However, with any activity there are risks of injuries and in some cases these may be gender specific and need to be considered to maximise the benefits of athletic participation. After evaluating multiple years of concussion incidence data in comparable sports, the evidence indicates that female athletes may be at greater risk for concussion than their male counterparts. There also is limited evidence that gender differences exist in outcomes of traumatic brain injury and concussions although there is almost no physiological understanding behind this finding. Incidence findings were apparent in sports where rules and equipment were similar (football (soccer), basketball) as well as in ice hockey, where women’s actual concussion rates were higher, though statistically not different than the men, despite the absence of the high risk activity of body checking. A subset of studies indicated that mechanism of concussion also may differ by gender. Specifically, limited studies show a greater susceptibility of women to concussion through contact with the surface or ball although there is no evidence that these specific events occur at the same frequency relative to males. There was only one study reviewed in this article13 and one study that was cited by multiple authors of the reviewed studies (based on retrospective recall that did not consider exposures22) reporting a higher incidence in concussion in a male sport.
To date, very little research includes possible explanations for gender differences in sport concussion. The majority of applicable literature has focused on nonathletic populations (eg, accident victims) and rodents. Biomechanical and hormonal evidence exists that may explain mechanisms of gender difference. Another possibility is more cultural, founded on the premise that the honesty and responsiveness of reporting as opposed to the actual incidence of concussion may be influenced by gender (table 3).
The prospective descriptive surveillance studies reviewed in this paper were designed to evaluate overall injury patterns and mechanisms in a sport, rather than specifically monitoring sport concussion. Subsequently, there were inconsistent definitions of reportable concussion and the concussion sample was often small and unbalanced by gender over a range of populations (high school to professional athletes). Because concussion is a clinical diagnosis often depending on self reporting and with no established biological marker or consistent symptoms/definitions, the incidence reported was most likely only a subset of actual occurrences. If research indicating females are more honest in reporting injuries than males is applicable to concussions, it is difficult to definitively state that the concussion incidence differences between gender noted in this review are real; they may be in some part related to reporting bias. In addition, increased awareness, better assessment technology and more research in recent years imply that we are much better able to recognise sport concussions today compared to a decade ago. Therefore, changes in trends over time may be a reflection of actual concussion cases, a greater ability to identify concussion cases, or some combination.
After evaluating multiple years of concussion incidence data in comparable sports, the evidence indicates that female athletes may be at greater risk for concussion than their male counterparts. While definitions and assessment techniques for concussions have changed over the past decade, the consistent finding of higher concussion rates among women across studies coupled with increasing participation justifies the need for focused research efforts in risk factor identification and appropriate subsequent interventions. Reported gender variability in response to baseline and post-concussion neuropsychological testing suggests the gender variable may be more than a morbidity risk factor. Future studies should focus specifically on concussion risk, mechanism and subsequent symptoms and recovery for both genders in similar sports. Standardised definitions, assessments and symptoms and a mechanism to account for potential gender self-reporting bias should be the foundation of this work.
What is known on this topic
More sport concussions are being reported and studied as the awareness of symptoms and knowledge of potential negative performance and health consequences has increased. Most of the existing sport concussion research has been performed on males, despite the increasing participation of females in sport over the last two decades.
What this study adds
Female athletes may be at greater risk for concussion than their male counterparts. There also is limited evidence that gender differences exist in outcomes of traumatic brain injury and concussions. However, the existing data has significant limitations that warrant more concussion-focused research to validate these initial findings.
Competing interests: None.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.