Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

Download PDFPDF
Posterior superior internal impingement: an evidence-based review
  1. Alessandro Castagna,
  2. Raffaele Garofalo,
  3. Eugenio Cesari,
  4. Nikolaos Markopoulos,
  5. Mario Borroni,
  6. Marco Conti
  1. Shoulder Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Institute, Milan, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Dr Raffaele Garofalo, Via Padova 13-70029, Santeramo in Colle-Ba, Italy; raffaelegarofalo{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Over the last decade, the concept of internal impingement has continued to evolve, and the frequency with which this condition is recognised continues to increase. This syndrome should be clearly differentiated from the classical (external) impingement that is thought to be caused by compression of the subacromial bursa, long head of the biceps tendon and rotator cuff (RC) by the coraco-acromial arch. Internal (posterosuperior) impingement syndrome is typified by a painful shoulder due to impingement of the soft tissue, including the RC, joint capsule and the posterosuperior part of the glenoid. The aetiology of this syndrome is unclear, but hypotheses include anterior shoulder instability or micro-instability, contracture of the posterior capsule, reduced humeral retroversion and scapular dyskinesis. Non-operative therapy represents the first line of treatment for this syndrome and includes the management of pain, stretching of the posterior capsule and a muscle strengthening programme. Surgical treatment should only be considered when conservative management fails. A number of different surgical procedures have been proposed, but the results are variable. The success rate is generally improved when the subtle instability, associated with internal impingement, is also addressed.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

  • Detail has been removed from this case description or these case descriptions to ensure anonymity. The editors and reviewers have seen the detailed information available and are satisfied that the information backs up the case the authors are making.

Linked Articles

  • Miscellaneous
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine