Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Different shoes (running shoes, racing flats and spikes) alter biomechanical variables in runners – differences between the running shoes were greater in male compared with female athletes.
Background
Distance runners use a variety of shoes during training and competition – these shoes may affect running biomechanics, and therefore the risk of injury.
Research question/s
In distance runners, are there any differences in biomechanical variables (ground reaction forces) between running shoes, racing flats and distance spikes?
Methodology
Subjects: 20 intercollegiate distance runners (males=10, 21.6±3.0 years; females=10, 20.0±1.5 years).
Experimental procedure: All the subjects were assessed and then ran across a force plate (males at 6.7 m/s and females at 5.7 m/s) in each of the three types of shoes (running shoes – RS, racing flats – RF and distance spikes – DS) in a randomised fashion. Only subjects who exhibited a heel strike were included in the data analysis.
Measures of outcome: Differences between shoe types and between genders for peak vertical impact force (BW), loading rate (BW/s), stance time (s), vertical stiffness (BW/m), peak braking force (BW).
Main finding/s
Stance times were shorter and maximum propulsion forces were greater in racing flats compared to running shoes in females.
Conclusion/s
Different shoes (running shoes, racing flats and spikes) alter biomechanical variables in runners – differences between the running shoes were greater in male compared with female athletes.
Evidence-based rating: 7/10
Clinical interest rating: 7/10
Type of study: Randomised, controlled, clinical …
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.