You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Reviews
Treatment of proximal metatarsal V fractures in athletes and non-athletes
  1. Gino M Kerkhoffs,
  2. Viktor E Versteegh,
  3. Inger N Sierevelt,
  4. Peter Kloen,
  5. C Niek van Dijk
  1. Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Gino M Kerkhoffs, Academic Medical Centre, Orthopaedic Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1100 DD, Netherlands; g.m.kerkhoffs{at}amc.nl

https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090389

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Introduction

    Since the first publication on proximal metatarsal V fractures by Jones in 1902,1 there has been a lot of controversy about the classification and ideal treatment of the proximal metatarsal V fracture. The controversy includes mainly the different anatomical,2,–,4 radiological5 and aetiological aspects.6,–,9 A proper understanding of these different aspects of the proximal metatarsal V fracture is essential, because a right interpretation of fracture type and the appropriate treatment strategy may greatly diminish the time to return to competitive sports or activities of daily living (ADL).

    The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment strategies of the different proximal metatarsal V fractures (avulsion, Jones and stress fractures, figure 1) and their outcomes in athletes and non-athletes.

    Figure 1

    Anatomical locations of the different types of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures. The anatomic locations of the different types of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures are visualised in the grey-coloured areas. 1) Avulsion fracture (fracture of the tuberosity of the fifth metatarsal). 2) Jones fracture (border of metaphysis and diaphysis; fracture involving the intermetatarsal joint). 3) Stress fracture (fracture in the proximal diaphysis, distal from the intermetatarsal joint).

    This evaluation is based on a critical overview of the current literature combined with the opinion of a group of international experts.

    The hypothesis of this study is that operative treatment is the most effective treatment strategy for all proximal metatarsal V fractures, besides the non-displaced avulsion fracture.

    Materials and methods

    Literature overview

    A literature search was performed covering …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.