You are here

Article Text

Article menu

This article has a correction. Please see:

Download PDFPDF

Commentary
Emerging concept: ‘central benefit model’ of exercise in falls prevention
  1. Teresa Liu-Ambrose1,2,3,
  2. Lindsay S Nagamatsu1,2,3,4,
  3. Chun Liang Hsu1,2,3,
  4. Niousha Bolandzadeh1,2,3
  1. 1Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  2. 2Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  3. 3Brain Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  4. 4Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Teresa Liu-Ambrose, University of British Columbia, Physical Therapy, 212–2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada; tlambrose{at}exchange.ubc.ca

Abstract

Falls are a common geriatric syndrome and are the third leading cause of chonic disability worldwide. Falls are not random events and occur, at least in part, due to impaired physiological function, such as impaired balance, and cognitive impairment. The clinical syndrome of falls is important for Sports and Exercise Medicine Clinicians as there is Level 1 evidence that targeted exercise prescription is an effective intervention strategy. The widely accepted dogma is that improved physical function, balance and muscle strength, underlies the effectiveness of the exercise in reducing falls. However, findings from randomised controlled trials suggest that exercise reduce falls via mechanisms other than improved physiological function. The authors propose that improved cognitive function – specifically, executive functions – and associated functional plasticity may be an important yet underappreciated mechanism by which the exercise reduces falls in older adults.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090725

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Background

    Falls are a common geriatric syndrome and are the third leading cause of chonic disability worldwide1. About 30% of community dwellers over the age of 65 experience one or more falls every year2. About 20% of falls require medical attention and 5% result in fracture, with one-third of those being hip fractures. Falls place a major and increasing demand on the public health system.

    Falls are not random events and occur, at least in part, due to impaired physiological function, such as impaired balance, and cognitive impairment2. The clinical syndrome of falls is important for Sports and Exercise Medicine clinicians as there is Level 1 evidence3 that targeted exercise prescription is an effective intervention strategy4. The Otago Exercise Program (OEP) – a physical therapist-delivered, or nurse-delivered, progressive home-based strength and balance training program tailored for older adults4 – is the exercise training program with the strongest evidence for falls prevention in older adults. As with many conditions, exercise for falls prevention is an example of ‘exercise is medicine’.5

    The widely accepted dogma is that improved physical function, balance and muscle strength, underlies the effectiveness of the exercise in reducing falls. However, in a meta-analysis of four OEP randomised trials, falls were significantly reduced by 35% while postural sway significantly improved by only 9% and there was no significant improvement in knee extension strength.6 These data demand explanation – does exercise reduce falls via mechanisms other than improved physiological function? We propose that improved cognitive function and associated functional plasticity may be an important yet underappreciated mechanism by which the exercise reduces falls in older adults.

    Falls and executive functions

    Within the multiple domains of cognitive function, reduced executive functions are associated with falls7 ,8 and injurious falls.9 Executive functions are higher order cognitive processes that control, integrate, organise and maintain other cognitive abilities. These cognitive processes include the ability to concentrate, attend selectively, plan and strategise. In a prospective study of inpatient falls in an urban rehabilitation hospital, performance on the Stroop Color-Word Test, a standard neuropsychological test of selective attention and conflict resolution, predicted falls status beyond that explained by age and functional motor ability.7 In additionAnstey et al 10 reported that senior fallers (both single and recurrent) performed significantly worse on a measure of selective attention and conflict resolution compared with non fallers. Given that movement through the environment requires attending to relevant stimuli and inhibiting prepotent, yet potentially unsafe, responses, it is logical that selective attention and conflict resolution is related to falls.

    Our conceptual framework for the proposed central benefit model is illustrated in figure 1. This framework highlights that reduced executive functions may increase the propensity to fall via various pathways including impaired balance11 and gait12 secondary to reduced attentional capacity, impaired central processing and integration and impaired execution of postural responses. Reduced executive functions may also increase falls risk via decreased judgement and diminished self-regulation,7 or indirectly increase falls risk via secondary disruptions in executive functions-related behaviour, such as a loss in motivation and initiation. Conversely, impaired balance and gait and loss of motivation and initiation13 may lead to further reductions in executive functions (ie, feedback loop). Notably, targeted exercise training reduces falls risk in older adults by maintaining or promoting executive functions.

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Conceptual framework for the central benefit model. Arrows indicate direct consequence. T-bar indicates prevention. This framework highlights that reduced executive functions may increase the propensity to fall via various pathways including impaired balance11 and gait12 secondary to reduced attentional capacity, impaired central processing and integration and impaired execution of postural responses. Reduced executive functions may also increase falls risk via decreased judgment and diminished self-regulation,7 or indirectly increase falls risk via secondary disruptions in executive functions-related behaviour, such as a loss in motivation and initiation.13 Conversely, impaired balance and gait and loss of motivation and initiation may lead to further reductions in executive functions (ie, feedback loop). Notably, targeted exercise training reduces falls risk in older adults by maintaining or promoting executive functions.

    Critically, reduced executive functions are prevalent among healthy, community-dwelling seniors with intact global cognitive function (ie, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥24/30).14 This is not surprising given many of the pathological changes (eg, white matter lesions) associated with reduced executive functions are prevalent but clinically silent.

    Exercise and executive functions

    Physical activity maintains and enhances cognition across the lifespan.15 A meta-analysis concluded that aerobic training had robust but selective benefits for cognition; the largest benefits occurred for executive functions.16 Resistance training also benefited executive functions and its associated functional plasticity.17 ,18

    Does exercise reduce falls by improving executive functions and associated functional plasticity?

    Recent evidence from randomised controlled trials supports the hypothesis that exercise may reduce falls by improved executive functions. This concept challenges the current paradigm of falls-prevention strategies that focus solely on improving physical function and minimising environmental hazards. Critically, our proof-of-concept randomised controlled trial found that the OEP significantly reduced falls by 47% among older adults with a significant history of falls – in the absence of significant improvement in physical function (ie, balance and muscle strength).19 Notably, cognitive performance of selective attention and conflict resolution improved in the OEP group as compared with the usual care (ie, control) group. Another randomised controlled trial demonstrated that improved selective attention and conflict resolution secondary to 12 months of progressive resistance training was associated with improved usual gait speed.17 Gait speed is a significant and independent predictor of falls and fracture risk in older women.20 Moreover, improved gait speed is a predictor of substantial reduction in mortality.21 Providing additional support for the central benefit theory, Li et al demonstrated five sessions of non-motor cognitive dual-task training results in significant improvements on measures of dual-task standing balance and mobility, compared with an untrained control group.22

    Emerging evidence from neuroimaging studies also support our proposed central benefit model. Baseline functionality of brain regions that are part of the neural network associated with selective attention and conflict resolution23 ,24 were independently associated with change in falls risk profile.25 Critically, both aerobic26 and resistance training18 can significantly enhance the functional plasticity of these regions associated with falls risk profile. Additional future research is needed and welcomed to assess the validity of our proposed central benefit model.

    Clinical implications of the central benefit model in falls prevention

    Given the strong association between executive functions and falls, we recommend that falls risk screening include far greater attention to assessment of cognitive processes – in particular executive processes of selective attention and conflict resolution and dual tasking. In addition, future falls-prevention strategies should consider intervention components that target executive functions. For example, both aerobic exercise training and progressive resistance training have specific benefits on functional plasticity in brain regions that are responsible executive functions.18 ,26 Therefore, both types of exercise training should be incorporated into the current exercise-based falls-prevention strategies that focus primarily on balance training.

    Acknowledgments

    Teresa Liu-Ambrose is a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Scholar, a Canadian Institutes of Health Research New Investigator, and a Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada's Henry JM Barnett's Scholarship recipient. Lindsay Nagamatsu is a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Senior Graduate trainee and a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Doctoral trainee.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Murray C,
      2. Lopez A
      . Global and regional descriptive epidemiology of disability: incidence, prevalence, health expectancies, and years lived with disability. In: Murray C, Lopez A, eds. The Global Burden of Disease. Boston: The Harvard School of Public Health 1996:201–46.
    2. ↵
      1. Tinetti ME,
      2. Speechley M,
      3. Ginter SF
      . Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med 1988;319:1701–7.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      1. Rich N
      . Levels of evidence. Journal of Women's Health Physical Therapy 2005;29:19–20.
      OpenUrl
    4. ↵
      1. Gillespie LD,
      2. Robertson MC,
      3. Gillespie WJ,
      4. et al
      . Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;2:CD007146.
    5. ↵
      Swedish Professional Associations for Physical Activity. Physical activity in the prevention and treatment of disease. Swedish Professional Associations for Physical Activity 2011.
    6. ↵
      1. Robertson MC,
      2. Campbell AJ,
      3. Gardner MM,
      4. et al
      . Preventing injuries in older people by preventing falls: a meta-analysis of individual-level data. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:905–11.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    7. ↵
      1. Rapport LJ,
      2. Hanks RA,
      3. Millis SR,
      4. et al
      . Executive functioning and predictors of falls in the rehabilitation setting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:629–33.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    8. ↵
      1. Anstey KJ,
      2. von Sanden C,
      3. Luszcz MA
      . An 8-year prospective study of the relationship between cognitive performance and falling in very old adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006;54:1169–76.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      1. Nevitt MC,
      2. Cummings SR,
      3. Hudes ES
      . Risk factors for injurious falls: a prospective study. J Gerontol 1991;46:M164–70.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    10. ↵
      1. Anstey KJ,
      2. Wood J,
      3. Kerr G,
      4. et al
      . Different cognitive profiles for single compared with recurrent fallers without dementia. Neuropsychology 2009;23:500–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    11. ↵
      1. Dault MC,
      2. Geurts AC,
      3. Mulder TW,
      4. et al
      . Postural control and cognitive task performance in healthy participants while balancing on different support-surface configurations. Gait Posture 2001;14: 248–55.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    12. ↵
      1. Holtzer R,
      2. Verghese J,
      3. Xue X,
      4. et al
      . Cognitive processes related to gait velocity: results from the Einstein Aging Study. Neuropsychology 2006;20:215–23.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    13. ↵
      1. Ylikoski R,
      2. Hänninen T
      . Assessment of executive function in clinical trials. Int Psychogeriatr 2003;15(Suppl 1):219–24.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    14. ↵
      1. Royall DR
      . Prevalence of executive control function (ECF) impairment among healthy non-institutionalized retirees: the Freedom House Study. Gerontologist 1998;38S:314–15.
      OpenUrl
    15. ↵
      1. Voss MW,
      2. Nagamatsu LS,
      3. Liu-Ambrose T,
      4. et al
      . Exercise, brain, and cognition across the life span. J Appl Physiol 2011;111:1505–13.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    16. ↵
      1. Colcombe S,
      2. Kramer AF
      . Fitness effects on the cognitive function of older adults: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Sci 2003;14:125–30.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    17. ↵
      1. Liu-Ambrose T,
      2. Nagamatsu LS,
      3. Graf P,
      4. et al
      . Resistance training and executive functions: a 12-month randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:170–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    18. ↵
      1. Liu-Ambrose T,
      2. Nagamatsu LS,
      3. Voss MW,
      4. et al
      . Resistance training and functional plasticity of the aging brain: a 12-month randomized controlled trial. Neurobiol Aging 2011 (In Press).
    19. ↵
      1. Liu-Ambrose T,
      2. Donaldson MG,
      3. Ahamed Y,
      4. et al
      . Otago home-based strength and balance retraining improves executive functioning in older fallers: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:1821–30.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    20. ↵
      1. Dargent-Molina P,
      2. Favier F,
      3. Grandjean H,
      4. et al
      . Fall-related factors and risk of hip fracture: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 1996;348:145–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    21. ↵
      1. Hardy SE,
      2. Perera S,
      3. Roumani YF,
      4. et al
      . Improvement in usual gait speed predicts better survival in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55:1727–34.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    22. ↵
      1. Li KZ,
      2. Roudaia E,
      3. Lussier M,
      4. et al
      . Benefits of cognitive dual-task training on balance performance in healthy older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2010;65:1344–52.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    23. ↵
      1. Haupt S,
      2. Axmacher N,
      3. Cohen MX,
      4. et al
      . Activation of the caudal anterior cingulate cortex due to task-related interference in an auditory Stroop paradigm. Hum Brain Mapp 2009;30:3043–56.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    24. ↵
      1. Boehler CN,
      2. Appelbaum LG,
      3. Krebs RM,
      4. et al
      . Pinning down response inhibition in the brain–conjunction analyses of the Stop-signal task. Neuroimage 2010;52:1621–32.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    25. ↵
      1. Nagamatsu LS,
      2. Hsu CL,
      3. Handy TC,
      4. et al
      . Functional neural correlates of reduced physiological falls risk. Behav Brain Funct 2011;7:37.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    26. ↵
      1. Colcombe SJ,
      2. Kramer AF,
      3. Erickson KI,
      4. et al
      . Cardiovascular fitness, cortical plasticity, and aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:3316–21.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Funding This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOB-93373) to TLA.

    • Competing interests None.

    • Ethics approval UBC CREB.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles

    • Correction
      Correction
      BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine
      British Journal of Sports Medicine 2013; 47 856-856 Published Online First: 09 Aug 2013. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090725corr1