Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Marathon related cardiac arrest risk differences in men and women
  1. William O Roberts1,
  2. Dana M Roberts2,
  3. Scott Lunos3
  1. 1Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota, USA
  2. 2Hatfield Family Medicine, Tempe, Arizona, USA
  3. 3Biostatistical Design and Analysis Center, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
  1. Correspondence to William Roberts, University of Minnesota, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Phalen Village Clinic, University of Minnesota, 1414 Maryland Avenue East, St Paul, Minnesota MN 55106, USA; rober037{at}


Objective To determine the incidence of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in men and women.

Design Retrospective cohort study.

Setting Two popular urban 42 km marathons.

Participants 1982 to 2009 finishers.

Assessment of risk factors Race records were assessed for finishers, age distribution and cardiac events by sex.

Main outcome measures The SCA/SCD incidence for all (total), male and female finishers.

Results There were 548 092 finishers with women finishers increasing from 10% to 40% over the first 18 years and remaining near 40% for the last decade. There were 14 SCA events (1 woman, 13 men) with seven successful resuscitations yielding an all finishers SCA rate of 2.6 per 100 000 finishers. The SCA rates (per 100 000) for men and women were 3.4 (95% CI: 1.8 to 5.9) and 0.6 (95% CI: 0.0 to 3.3), respectively (p=0.079). The male SCA rate for the 2000–2009 decade was 4.6 per 100 000 finishers (95% CI: 1.8 to 9.5). Eleven of 13 men were >39 years old. The OR of a man experiencing SCA compared with woman was 5.7.

Conclusions As the number of women participating in these two marathons has increased, the difference between the men's and total SCA and SCD incidence has increased for men, especially >39 years old, from coronary artery disease with men's incidence for SCA of 1 in 22 000 and SCD at 1 in 50 000 finishers over past decade.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval University of Minnesota Investigational Review Board (0712E23241).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • ▸ References to this paper are available online at