Article Text

Download PDFPDF
  1. A Fearon1,2,
  2. J E Dahlstrom2,
  3. J Twin3,
  4. J Cook4,
  5. A Scott1
  1. 1Department of Physical Therapy, UBC, Vancouver, Canada
  2. 2ANU Medical School, ANU, Canberra, Australia
  3. 3Capital Pathology. Canberra Australia
  4. 4Physiotherapy Department Monash University, Melbourne, Australia


    Introduction Grading the extent of degenerative change in tendon is an important aspect of tendinopathy research. The Bonar score1 has been widely used for this purpose since 2004. This method provides valuable guidelines for tendinosis assessment but is not without limitations, and many groups have made modifications to the original method.2 It is common for researchers to evaluate the area of highest morphological change, however the method of defining this area, and the implications of using different methods, have not been documented. In this study, we asked whether selecting the level of greatest morphological change using different aspects of the score (degree of collagen disruption, the level of cell morphological change, or the degree of vascularity) would lead to similar or different Bonar scores.

    Methods Human tendon from people undergoing gluteal tendon reconstruction or hip arthroplasty was assessed in each part of this study. Two researchers experienced in using the Bonar score systematically reviewed each domain of the Bonar score while viewing tendon sections. By consensus, the appropriate level of magnification used for each domain was determined. The need for polarisation was also reviewed. Additional clauses of pathological acellularity and avascularity were added to the third. Hyper and hypo cellularity were defined, and, modification of the vascularity and cellularity scores were confirmed. Two researchers, with a third to resolve disputes evaluated 32 sections of tendon. Each domain within the Bonar score was evaluated in each of the following areas: the area of worst collagen disruption; the area scoring the highest vascularity; and thirdly the area scoring the highest tenocyte morphology change.

    Results A total of 84 areas of tendon were evaluated. The total Bonar score was highest in the areas of most cellular morphological (CM) changes (mean, (SD) 14.4 (1.50)) then highest collagen disruption (CD: 13.0 (2.56)), and lowest for the area of vascularity (VS) (11.6 (1.68), (regression: CD vs TM p=0.008, CM vs VS p<0.001, CD vs VS p=0.013). Our review of this method found that collagen disruption should be assessed over the entire section using ×100 total magnification with polarisation. The field of view (FoV) with the highest level of disruption should be further evaluated to provide the section score.

    Conclusions and recommendations This paper provides clarification of, and recommendations on the use of the commonly used Bonar score. Cellularity is best assessed using one FoV×100. In human tissue, hypo-cellularity ≤20 nuclei per HPF, Hyper-cellularity ≥30 nuclei per HPF. Normal=20 to 30 nuclei per HPF. Cell morphology was best assessed at ×200 magnification, over four FoV. Vascularity should be assessed at ×400 magnification, up to 10 FoV, and Ground substance was best assessed at ×100. When evaluating a FoV, a 20% rule should be applied. That is, if 20% of the tissue can be scored at the highest level, this score is applied to the entire FoV. To provide accurate/reliable assessment, tendon sections should be viewed by a minimum, of two researchers, simultaneously, but independently with the final score decided either by consensus, or a third assessor.

    These results suggest that using the area of maximum tenocyte morphological changes provides a justifiable score that is representative of the worst degree of tendinosis in the specimen. We believe our modified Bonar score provides clearer definitions of each grade and also specifies the level of magnification for each domain, producing a more robust assessment tool. Further evaluation of the Bonar score's applicability to commonly used tendinopathy laboratory models should be carried out.

    Statistics from

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.