Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The three must-do's of intervention reporting: enhancing sports injury prevention research
  1. James O'Brien,
  2. Alex Donaldson,
  3. Gaery Barbery,
  4. Caroline F Finch
  1. Centre for Healthy and Safe Sport (CHASS), University of Ballarat, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to James O'Brien, Centre for Healthy and Safe Sport (CHASS), University of Ballarat, SMB Campus, PO Box 668, Ballarat, VIC 3353, Australia; ja.obrien{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Injuries in team ball sports (eg, soccer, handball, volleyball and basketball) are common, accounting for 44% of all non-fatal sports injuries in the 27 EU Nations.1 Combined with high participation rates, this gives team ball sports the potential to pose significant health burdens, and highlights the importance of preventing injuries in this context.

As neuromuscular injury prevention programmes for team ball sports gain increasing attention,27 the need to establish the effectiveness of these interventions in real-world sports settings has been emphasised.813 Conceptual models and frameworks from the broader field of health promotion can potentially facilitate the translation of efficacious interventions into practice, and examples of applying implementation science to sports injury prevention have been reported.9 ,14 ,15

The RE-AIM framework16 ,17 was developed to enhance the translation of research into practice, and has been applied in such diverse fields as falls prevention,18 weight loss19 and mental health.20 Recently, an extension of the framework specific to the community sport context, the RE-AIM Sports Setting Matrix, has also been developed (table 1).14 The RE-AIM framework can be applied across all research phases, from planning and implementation, to reporting and reviewing.17 However, there have been very few assessments of how RE-AIM has actually been used in any context. Recently, the RE-AIM Model Dimension Items Checklist (MDIC) was developed to assist the reviewing of project grant applications.21 This checklist comprises 31 items covering the five RE-AIM dimensions of Reach (4 items), Effectiveness (5 items), Adoption (8 items), Implementation (5 items) and …

View Full Text


  • Contributors JO designed the study and led its conduct. He selected the papers for review and had the major role in paper writing. This work was led by JO as part of his PhD studies, supervised by CFF. All other authors independently reviewed the selected papers, participated in the consensus discussions and contributed to the writing of the paper.

  • Competing interests Authors JO and GB were supported by University of Ballarat Postgraduate Scholarships. CFF was supported by an NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship (ID:565900).

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.