Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
It is well recognised that for over three decades the aetiology, whether of hip or adductor, or groin related, and subsequent management, whether surgical or otherwise, of ‘sportsman's groin’ remains mainly controversial with the literature reporting mainly case series with a few randomised trials comparing differing treatment modalities and offering some anecdotal evidence. Eventually, in 2014, the world's first consensus statement was published, which has bravely attempted to define a condition where no true hernia exists but that is a perceived repetitive strain injury causing inguinal pain and/or disruption.1
The literature to date does report some prospective randomised data on open and laparoscopic surgical results, in comparison to active physiotherapy and other conservative measures, however, there are few high-quality studies, as reported by Serner et al, with surgery not figuring high on the treatment agenda.2–4
Some of these trials do, however, appear to demonstrate a distinct leaning towards surgical repair of the disrupted groin and associated chronic pain as the treatment of choice. The surgical repair technique used, though, has largely been an example on the expertise available in the respective units carrying out such repairs. This rationale is ever apparent, as no real study from any ‘sports groin’ unit has reported on more than one type of procedure being undertaken for inguinal-related groin pain or …
Twitter Follow Aali Sheen at @aalisheen
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.