Background Groin injuries are troublesome in men's and women's football.
Aim To review the literature on the epidemiology of groin injury in senior football and compare injury occurrence between sexes.
Methods Studies were identified through a search of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science, in the reference lists of the selected articles and the authors’ bibliographies. The number of injuries, percentage of groin injury from all injuries and rate of groin injury per 1000 h were extracted. Exposure and injury data were aggregated across included studies and the absolute differences in groin injury proportion and rate of groin injury were compared between sexes. Risk of bias was assessed using a 5-item checklist.
Results 34 articles met the study criteria and were included. The proportion of groin injury in club-seasonal football was 4–19% in men and 2–14% in women. Aggregated data analysis (29 studies) showed a higher relative proportion of groin injury in men than in women (12.8% vs 6.9%, absolute difference 5.9%, 95% CI 4.6% to 7.1%). The rate of groin injury varied from 0.2 to 2.1/1000 h in men and 0.1 to 0.6/1000 h in women's club football, and aggregated analysis (23 studies) showed a more than two-fold higher rate in men (0.83/1000 h vs 0.35/1000 h, rate ratio 2.4, 95% CI 2.0 to 2.9). High risk of bias was identified for participant selection (18 studies), exposure (17 studies) and precision estimate (16 studies).
Conclusions Groin injuries are frequent in senior football and are more common in men than women. Future research needs to be of higher quality.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Football is the world's most popular sport with more than 265 million active players according to the Big Count of the Féderation International de Football Association (FIFA) in 2006.1 A majority of the football players sustain at least one injury causing lay-off from football each season and the vast majority of the injuries are located to the lower extremities.2 ,3 Groin injuries, or sometimes referred to as hip and groin injuries, often constitute a diagnostic challenge for the medical practitioner. Whereas the hip joint is anatomically well-defined, the groin area is, by contrast, not unambiguously specified, but usually refers to the junction between the lower abdomen and the anteromedial part of the thigh.
The general rate of injury in football is known to be high, especially during match play, which has been reported repeatedly in different injury surveillance research.2 ,3 From collegiate football in the USA, it has been reported that the rate of groin injury is higher in men compared with women.4 ,5 However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no previously published review that specifically summarises the occurrence of groin injury in senior football. The objective of this paper was, therefore, to comprehensively review the literature on epidemiology of groin injury in men's and women's senior football, and to compare injury occurrence between sexes. Our hypothesis was that the occurrence of groin injury is higher in male compared with female players.
This review was prepared and conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.6 The review was registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (#CRD4201501637 3) before study selection and data extraction.
Potentially eligible studies were identified through a systematic search in the following electronic databases from inception to 26 January 2014: MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE via OVID, CINAHL via Ebesco, and Web of Science. The free-text search term “(football OR soccer) AND (groin inj* OR groin pain)” without any limitations was used in all four databases. One author (MW) carried out the electronic database search in collaboration with two librarians. All citations were imported to EndNote X7 (Thomson Reuters, USA) and duplicates were removed by the first author (MW).
Articles were screened in three steps (title, abstract, full text) according to predetermined study criteria. Two authors (MW and MH) skimmed all titles and abstracts, and selected potential studies for inclusion independently. Full texts were retrieved and reviewed for articles that clearly met the inclusion criteria or those that could not be explicitly excluded from the title and abstract. In addition, manual searches in the reference lists of the selected articles and the authors’ bibliographies were undertaken by the two reviewers in order to identify other potentially relevant studies. Disagreements were resolved via consensus, and a third author (JE) was to be consulted if no agreement was reached. No hand-search of specific sports medicine journals was performed.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Articles were included in this review if they met the following criteria: (1) were original level I and II articles with a prospective design (cohort studies, clinical trials, randomised trials), (2) reported groin injury data in organised senior (adult) football play, (3) had a study period encompassing at least one playing season or national team tournament, (4) defined injury according to medical attention and/or time-loss, and (5) were written in English.
The following articles were excluded from this review: (1) expert opinions, case reports/series, case–control studies, cross-sectional studies and retrospective cohort studies, (2) duplicate publications and multiple studies on the same cohort, where studies were selected based on having groin injuries as the main objective (first priority) or the latest publication of the study cohort data (second priority), (3) studies with no available abstract, (4) studies published in journals without peer-review, (5) studies conducted in only one football club or team, (6) studies conducted on youth football, (7) studies conducted on indoor football (including futsal), (8) studies reporting injury data only for acute groin injuries or specific subtypes of groin injury (eg, only adductor injuries), and (9) studies on multiple sports where no football-specific injury data could be extracted.
Risk of bias assessment
A five-item study checklist was developed specifically for this review to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The five items were based on the “Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology” (STROBE) statement:7 (1) study setting, location and study period, (2) eligibility criteria, and sources and methods of participant selection, (3) exposure definition and measurement, (4) study outcome definition and measurement, and (5) main result and precision (eg, 95% CI). The studies were assessed as having a low or high risk of bias for each item. For all items, studies were assessed as having a high risk of bias if reporting was lacking or unclear. Additional examples for assessment of high risk of bias for each item are presented in online supplementary table S1. Two authors (MW and MH) assessed the included articles independently and disagreements were resolved via consensus. No study was excluded based on the risk of bias assessment.
We developed a standardised data extraction sheet where the following injury data, if available, were extracted from the studies meeting the inclusion criteria: (1) the absolute number of groin injuries (including injuries to the groin and hip) and the total number of injuries, (2) the percentage of groin injury from all recorded injuries, and (3) the overall rate of groin injury (expressed as the number groin injuries/1000 h). In addition, general information on study characteristics (authors, publication year, country of origin); characteristics of the study population (number of players, sex, setting); study design; injury definition; and exposure to football (study period, number of team-seasons, total player-exposure hours) was extracted from each study. The first author (MW) extracted all data which were checked by the second author (MH). If the rate of groin injury rate was not presented in the article, this was calculated by the authors of this review as ‘number of groin injuries/total player-exposure hours×1000’. The authors also calculated 95% CI for the injury rates to provide an estimate precision for each individual study.
To compare the relative groin injury proportion (percentage of all injuries) and the rate of groin injury rate between men and women, we aggregated the number of groin injuries, the total number of injuries and the total player-exposure hours for all studies (where data were available) to a summary score. The absolute difference in relative groin injury proportion is reported with a 95% CI and significance tested using z-statistics. The rate of groin injury was compared between sexes with a rate ratio (RR), presented with 95% CI and significance tested using z-statistics. Both tests were two-tailed and a p value <0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.
A total of 34 studies were included in this review (figure 1). The literature search yielded 611 citations; after adjusting for duplicates, 319 remained for the three-stage screening. Of these, 305 were discarded after reviewing the titles and abstracts. Full texts were retrieved for the remaining 14 studies which were examined in detail; six of these met the study inclusion criteria. In addition, 13 studies meeting the study criteria were identified in the reference lists of these selected six articles and another 15 studies were identified through review of the authors’ bibliographies. These 28 additional studies were all general injury surveillance studies that included estimates of groin injury rates within the body of the main text.
Risk of bias assessment
All 34 included studies were assessed for risk of bias (see online supplementary table S1). There were discrepancies between the two reviewers on 9 articles; all these discrepancies were resolved via consensus discussion without the need for involving the third author (JE). Most frequently, the discrepancies were for item 3 (in five articles) which assessed the definition and measurement of exposure.
The vast majority of the included studies accurately reported and were assessed as having a low risk of bias regarding study setting, location and study period (33 articles), and on study outcome definition (injury) and measurement (31 articles). However, approximately half of the studies were assessed to have a high risk of bias regarding eligibility criteria, and sources and methods of participant selection (18 articles), exposure definition and measurement (17 articles), and main result and precision (16 articles).
Two studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias for one item, 7 studies for two items, 8 studies for three items, 10 studies for four items, and 7 studies for all five items. There was a trend towards more low risk of bias items in newer publications where, for example, all articles published in the 1980s and 1990s scored low (two items), and all studies with four or five items assessed as having low risk of bias were published in 2004 or later.
Groin injury frequency in men's club football
We identified 20 studies that reported data on groin injury for at least one season in men's club football (table 1).8–27 One study reported on men's and women's elite football.20 One study defined injury according to a combination of medical attention and time-loss.21 All other studies included injuries according to various time-loss definitions; an injured player had to miss at least one future training session or match,8 ,13 ,14 ,19 ,20 ,27 the next training session or match,11 ,12 ,17 ,18 ,26 missed the next day,9 ,10 ,15 ,24 ,25 missed the next 2 days,16 or was not specified.19 ,20 All in all, the proportion of groin injury was between 4% and 19% of all injuries.
All studies were conducted in different European countries. Fourteen studies comprised one season and six included a varying number of consecutive seasons. Thirteen studies included the highest domestic playing level (division I) in their data set. One study reported inclusion of professional level teams, but the exact playing levels were unclear from that study.
Groin injury frequency in women's club football
In addition to the study that reported on men's and women's elite football,20 we identified nine studies reporting groin injury data in women's club football (table 2).28–36 These studies defined injury according to time-loss; an injured player had to miss at least one future training session or match,28 ,34 ,36 the next training session or match,31 ,32 ,35 missed the next day,29 ,33 or was removed from play or missed at least one future training session or match.30 All in all, the proportion of groin injury was between 2% and 11% of all injuries.
All studies on women's football were carried out in Europe (Sweden, Norway and Germany), and they followed one season each. Eight studies included the highest domestic playing level (division I) in their data set.
Groin injury frequency in international tournaments
We identified five studies conducted on international tournaments, such as World Cups, European Championships and Olympic Games (table 3).37–41 In the two studies investigating men's and women's tournaments, the percentage of groin injury was 5–11% and 0–2%, respectively.40 ,41 In studies reporting medical attention and expected time-loss injuries (only men's tournaments), the proportion of groin injury was 3–6% and 5–9%, respectively.37–39
Rate of groin injury in men's and women's club football
The reported and recalculated rates of groin injury for 23 of the studies are summarised in table 4. The rates varied from 0.2 to 2.1/1000 h in men's and 0.1 to 0.6/1000 h in women's club football. No trend towards an increase or decrease in the rate of groin injury over time was seen in one study spanning over seven consecutive seasons.27
Based on aggregated data from all 29 studies of club football (tables 1 and 2), the relative proportion of groin injury in men (2716 of 21 169) was higher than in women (126 of 1830), representing 12.8% vs 6.9% of all reported injuries (absolute difference 5.9%, 95% CI 4.6% to 7.1%, p<0.001). Similarly, based on aggregated data from the 23 studies where injury and exposure data were retrievable (1881 injuries and 2254420 h in men; 115 injuries and 330431 h in women), the rate of groin injury was more than twofold higher in men than women (0.83 vs 0.35/1000 h, RR 2.4, 95% CI 2.0 to 2.9, p<0.001).
The principal finding of the current review was that groin injury constitutes a substantial problem in men's and women's senior football. According to the 34 identified articles, however, groin injury appears to be a bigger problem in men than in women.
Frequency of groin injury
The vast majority of the included injury surveillance studies used a time-loss injury definition and approximately every eighth (men) to fourteenth (women) time-loss injury was located to the groin. Many groin injuries, however, are a result of overuse leading to pain and/or reduced performance, but may not cause time off from play, implying that the groin injury dilemma in football is likely to be underestimated.42 Interestingly, the frequency of groin injury appears to be lower in international tournaments compared with most of the club-season surveillance studies. In addition, almost all medical attention groin injuries registered during tournaments were expected to cause time-loss from play. Consequently, whereas groin injury during a club-season often is a result of overuse and thereby, thought to represent a ‘tip-of-the-iceberg’ phenomenon, the injuries sustained during a tournament are probably more acute—with a higher relative amount leading to time-loss.
Men's versus women's football
As shown in the current review, groin injury appears to be more frequent among male footballers compared with their female counterparts regardless of the injury definition, study design, setting and playing level. The proportion of groin injury during club-season play was 4–19% (aggregated 12.8%) in men's football and 2–11% (aggregated 6.9%) in women's football, suggesting that groin injury comprises a bigger proportion of the total injury burden in male footballers. Since these figures do not take player-exposure into consideration, we also evaluated the rate of groin injury (injuries/1000 h) between sexes, which showed similar results. In the current review, the rates ranged from 0.2 to 2.1/1000 h in men and 0.1 to 0.6/1000 h in women, and the aggregated data indicated a 2.4 higher rate of groin injury in men. Groin injury in male footballers might thus be considered to constitute a reverse gender bias phenomenon compared with the anterior cruciate ligament dilemma in football, which is indisputably bigger in female players.43 Although not determinable from the current review, possible reasons for this gender bias in groin injury rates might include internal (eg, differences in pelvic anatomy, muscle strength and force development, the occurrence of abdominal wall weakness/sportsman's hernia, etc.) and external factors (eg, training and match load, playing intensity, etc).
Based on the current overview and risk of bias assessment in this critical review, it is clear that more (high-quality) research is needed in some areas. As advised by the PRISMA study group,44 we would, therefore, suggest a few recommendations for future research. First, more studies reporting on the rate of groin injury with an accurate precision estimate are warranted, especially in women's football. Second, more studies with direct comparisons of injury frequencies and injury rates between the sexes are welcomed. Third, since many groin injuries are associated with overuse and may not lead to lay-off during a club-season, more studies investigating problems of pain and/or reduced performance as a result of groin symptoms not leading to time-loss are suggested.45 Fourth, future studies on groin injury in football should preferably report detailed data for specific diagnoses or clinical entities as done in a few studies.21 ,27 Fifth, all studies on women's football were carried out in Sweden, Norway and Germany, whereas the studies on men's football were spread more around Europe. In addition, most studies involved elite football cohorts. Thus, more studies are needed in other countries and continents, as well as in amateur and lower level football populations. Finally, although one study showed no apparent trend of increasing or decreasing injury rates over a 7-season period,27 future studies with longer follow-ups and the possibility for time-trend analyses of injury risk are advocated.
Some limitations with the current review should be acknowledged. Most importantly, many injury surveillance studies reported the number and percentage of groin injury in the body of the articles only and these injury data were rarely presented in the title or abstract. Consequently, many of the included articles were identified through the alternative search in the reference lists and in the authors’ bibliographies. As a result, there is a risk that some general injury surveillance studies that would meet the inclusion criteria of the current review were missed in the literature screening. We performed no meta-analysis of included studies and the aggregated injury proportions and injury rates presented in the review do not account for possible confounders, clustering effects or the degree of heterogeneity within the results of the included studies. Another note is that the inclusion and exclusion criteria were slightly revised after the registration of the review in the PROSPERO register. Briefly, we decided to include only level I and II (prospective) studies; we added studies investigating international tournaments; and excluded studies reporting injury data only for acute groin injuries or specific subtypes of groin injury (eg, muscle injuries). These changes from the original protocol should, however, have limited influence on the principal findings of the current review. Finally, since few studies report a clear definition of groin injury, and often report hip and groin injuries as a combined category as per the consensus statement for football injury surveillance,46 we report on the occurrence of injury to the hip and groin combined in our literature overview and calculations.
This comprehensive review on the epidemiology of groin injury in men's and women's senior football found that these injuries constitute between 7 to 13% of the injuries. Male football players had a more than twofold higher rate of groin injury compared with female players. Few studies, however, report data for specific diagnoses or clinical entities, and future groin injury research in football needs also to be of higher study quality.
What are the new findings?
Groin injury was a frequent occurrence in men's and women's senior football, comprising about 7 to 13% of all time-loss injuries.
Groin injury was more frequent in men's football, with a more than twofold higher rate identified in male compared with female players.
Few studies report detailed data for specific diagnoses or clinical entities, and this should preferably be included in future studies on groin injury in football.
The authors thank the hospital librarians Lone Heinlaid and Eva Karin Karlsson for their help with the literature search.
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Data supplement 1 - Online table
This paper is based on the authors’ lectures at the 1st World Conference on Groin Pain in Athletes, Doha, Qatar, 1st – 3rd November 2014.
Contributors MW and MH searched the literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. JE was consulted if disagreements were not resolved by discussion. MW wrote the first draft of the paper which was critically revised by the co-authors.
Funding The Football Research Group has been established in Linköping, Sweden, in collaboration with Linköping University and through grants from the Union of European Football Associations, the Swedish Football Association, the Football Association Premier League Limited and the Swedish National Centre for Research in Sports.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.