Article Text
PostScript
Response to ‘Screening for risk factors: if you liked it then you should have put a number on it’
Statistics from Altmetric.com
I wholeheartedly agree with Drs McCunn and Meyer1 that we should not demonise athlete screening, nor should we abandon prospective cohort studies to improve our understanding of causative factors. As pointed out in my recent review,2 as well as in the 2009 International Olympic Committee consensus paper on periodic health evaluation of elite athletes, …
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/