You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
PostScript
Response to ‘Screening for risk factors: if you liked it then you should have put a number on it’
  1. Roald Bahr
  1. Correspondence to Professor Roald Bahr, Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, P.O. Box 4014 Ullevaal Stadion, Oslo 806, Norway roald{at}nih.no

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096465

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    I wholeheartedly agree with Drs McCunn and Meyer1 that we should not demonise athlete screening, nor should we abandon prospective cohort studies to improve our understanding of causative factors. As pointed out in my recent review,2 as well as in the 2009 International Olympic Committee consensus paper on periodic health evaluation of elite athletes, …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles