Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Patient education in patellofemoral pain: potentially potent and essential, but under-researched
  1. Michael Skovdal Rathleff1,
  2. Janus Laust Thomsen1,
  3. Christian J Barton2
  1. 1 Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
  2. 2 La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre,, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Michael Skovdal Rathleff; misr{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

What is the value of patient education for managing patients with knee pain?

Louise is 19 years old and a keen runner. During the past 3–4 months, she gradually developed anterior knee pain, which was slowing her down. She has had similar knee pain before, but never this bad. Louise consults her healthcare practitioner and is diagnosed with patellofemoral pain (PFP), for which many recommended treatments with varying levels of supporting evidence exist.1 2 How should we guide the shared decision-making that will determine which treatment Louise tries first? Some treatments will require Louise to see a specialist physiotherapist who can instruct on changing her running technique (ie, gait retraining), while others require a physiotherapist who can prescribe a series of appropriate hip and knee exercises, foot orthoses or teach her to tape her knee. These interventions can be costly to the individual and the healthcare system, with most needing multiple sessions. Patient education, including strategies for self-management of knee pain, is another treatment which may help Louise. Education can be provided in both primary and secondary care, can be relatively inexpensive and may not require …

View Full Text


  • Contributors MSR, JLT and CJB discussed the outline of the editorial. MSR drafted the editorial. CB and JLT gave feedback on the draft and MSR wrote a final version which both authors then approved.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles