You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 52, Issue 15
  • Synthesising ‘best evidence’ in systematic reviews when randomised controlled trials are absent: three tips for authors to add value for clinician readers

Article metrics

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Editorial
Synthesising ‘best evidence’ in systematic reviews when randomised controlled trials are absent: three tips for authors to add value for clinician readers

 

Online download statistics by month:

Online download statistics by month: July 2017 to March 2024

AbstractFullPdf
Jul 20178995638
Aug 20172073123
Sep 20171031410
Oct 2017861611
Nov 20174741
Dec 20176331
Jan 20188252
Feb 20187873
Mar 20189464
Apr 20183757
May 20186864
Jun 20187024
Jul 2018111911368
Aug 20182503726
Sep 2018104158
Oct 20188144
Nov 201879112
Dec 201874115
Jan 20191031210
Feb 20195055
Mar 20197973
Apr 20195242
May 20197099
Jun 20195835
Jul 20194848
Aug 20194925
Sep 20195734
Oct 20192523
Nov 20193868
Dec 20192805
Jan 20203864
Feb 20204731
Mar 20202535
Apr 20204436
May 20205574
Jun 20202823
Jul 20202918
Aug 20203218
Sep 20203310
Oct 20204965
Nov 20204016
Dec 202061410
Jan 20213124
Feb 20215616
Mar 20211420
Apr 20214411
May 20211204
Jun 2021310
Jul 2021004
Aug 2021324
Sep 2021322
Oct 20213221
Nov 20213551
Dec 20218464
Jan 20223610
Feb 20228531
Mar 20225921
Apr 20222110
May 20224820
Jun 20224410
Jul 20222600
Aug 20226111
Sep 20225921
Oct 20223800
Nov 20223110
Dec 20221511
Jan 20231610
Feb 20237500
Mar 20232121
Apr 2023700
May 2023600
Jun 2023800
Jul 20231200
Aug 20231850
Sep 2023611
Oct 20232800
Nov 20232210
Dec 20234521
Jan 20242241
Feb 20241210
Mar 20243700
Total5854497388