Article Text

PDF
Exercise, orthoses and splinting for treating Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review with meta-analysis
  1. Fiona Wilson1,
  2. Margaret Walshe2,
  3. Tom O’Dwyer1,
  4. Kathleen Bennett3,
  5. David Mockler4,
  6. Christopher Bleakley5
  1. 1 School of Medicine, Discipline of Physiotherapy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  2. 2 Department of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  3. 3 RCSI Population and Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
  4. 4 John Stearne Library, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St. James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  5. 5 Department of Physical Therapy, Congdon School of Health Sciences, High Point University, High Point, North Carolina, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Fiona Wilson, School of Medicine, Discipline of Physiotherapy, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James’s Hospital, Dublin 8,Ireland; wilsonf{at}tcd.ie

Abstract

Objectives To assess the efficacy of exercise, orthoses and splinting on function, pain and quality of life (QoL) for the management of mid-portion and insertional Achilles tendinopathy, and to compare different types, applications and modes of delivery within each intervention category.

Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources Medline, CINAHL, Embase, AMED, WHO ICTRP, Web of Science, PEDro and Cochrane Library from inception to October 2017. Citation tracking of published studies and conference proceedings and contacting experts in the field.

Study eligibility criteria Controlled clinical trials evaluating either exercise, orthoses or splinting for the management of Achilles tendinopathy.

Methods Independent reviewers undertook searches, screening and risk of bias appraisal. Primary outcomes of interest were function, pain and QoL.

Results Twenty-two studies were included (1137 participants). Moderate level evidence favoured eccentric exercise over control for improving pain and function in mid-portion tendinopathy. Moderate level evidence favoured eccentric exercise over concentric exercise for reducing pain. There was moderate level evidence of no significant difference in pain or function between eccentric exercise and heavy slow resistance exercise. There was low level evidence that eccentric exercise was not superior to stretching for pain or QoL. There was moderate level evidence that a combined exercise protocol was not superior to a lower dosage protocol for improving functional performance. There was moderate to low level evidence of a significant difference in pain (mean difference (MD) 6.3 mm, 95% CI −4.45 to 17.04, moderate) or function (MD 1.83 Victoria Institute of Sport Assessment points, 95% CI −7.47 to 11.12, low) between high-dose and low-dose eccentric training. There was high to moderate level evidence of no difference in pain (moderate) or function (high) between orthoses and control. There was low level evidence of no significant benefit in adding a night splint to an eccentric exercise programme for function, and moderate level evidence for no reduction in pain (MD −3.50, 95% CI −10.49 to 3.48). Eccentric exercise was not superior to splinting for pain (moderate evidence) or function (low level evidence).

Summary We conditionally recommend exercise for improving pain and function in mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy. The balance of evidence did not support recommendation of one type of exercise programme over another. We conditionally recommend against the addition of a splint to an eccentric exercise protocol and we do not recommend the use of orthoses to improve pain and function in Achilles tendinopathy.

  • tendinopathy
  • exercise
  • orthotics
  • rehabilitation
  • achilles

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors FW conducted the literature search, extracted and analysed data, synthesised findings and constructed the manuscript. MW and CB assisted in data extraction, analysis and synthesis and contributed to the final manuscript. DM constructed and executed searches. KB advised on statistical analysis and TO’D constructed and edited the manuscript.

  • Funding This review was supported by the National Institute for Health Research via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group.

  • Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.