Article info

Download PDFPDF

The physical activity paradox: six reasons why occupational physical activity (OPA) does not confer the cardiovascular health benefits that leisure time physical activity does

Authors

  • Andreas Holtermann National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Niklas Krause Departments of Epidemiology and Environmental Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Allard J van der Beek Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Leon Straker School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Dr Andreas Holtermann, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; aho{at}nrcwe.dk
View Full Text

Citation

Holtermann A, Krause N, van der Beek AJ, et al
The physical activity paradox: six reasons why occupational physical activity (OPA) does not confer the cardiovascular health benefits that leisure time physical activity does

Publication history

  • First published August 10, 2017.
Online issue publication 
January 19, 2018

Article Versions

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.