You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Editorial
Red flags or red herrings? Redefining the role of red flags in low back pain to reduce overimaging
  1. Gilat L Grunau1,
  2. Ben Darlow2,
  3. Timothy Flynn3,
  4. Kieran O’Sullivan4,
  5. Peter B O’Sullivan5,
  6. Bruce B Forster1
  1. 1 Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  2. 2 Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
  3. 3 School of Physical Therapy, South College, Knoxville, TN, USA
  4. 4 Department of Clinical Therapies, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
  5. 5 Department of Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Gilat L Grunau, Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, 3350-950 W 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada; gilat{at}alumni.ubc.ca

https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-097725

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Low back pain is the leading cause of years lived with disability and the second most common reason for a physician visit.1 Although its prevalence has not changed, imaging for low back pain and the cost of its management have continued to increase. For example, in a US study 9.6% of all patients with low back pain had a CT or MRI in 2006 compared with 3.2% in 2002.1

    Lumbar imaging is of low yield in the general population presenting with low back pain, as the majority of cases are self-limited and benign. In a previous editorial,2 we discussed the negative effects of inappropriate imaging such as subsequent additional downstream testing, additional imaging, invasive diagnostic procedures and unwarranted patient fear and anxiety leading to poorer outcomes, with concomitant cost and radiation exposure.

    Lumbar imaging is indicated when serious pathology is suspected and red flags are an accepted method for identifying when such pathology …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles