Article Text

Download PDFPDF

‘Only by speaking out can we create lasting change’: what can we learn from the Dr Larry Nassar tragedy?
  1. Margo Mountjoy1,2
  1. 1 Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  2. 2 International Olympic Committee - Games Group, Lausanne, Switzerland
  1. Correspondence to Dr Margo Mountjoy, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada; mmsportdoc{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

As it turns out… Dr Nassar was not a doctor, he in fact is, was, and forever shall be, a child molester and a monster of a human being. End of story. He abused my trust, he abused my body and he left scars on my psyche that may never go away.

McKayla Maroney, Olympic Gold Medallist, London 2012.

Dr Larry Nassar was sentenced on 24 January 2018 to 40–125 years in prison in Eaton County and 40–175 years in Ingham County, Michigan, USA, for first-degree criminal sexual conduct in addition to 60 years in Federal court for child pornography. During the court proceedings, 156 women who call themselves the ‘army of survivors’, spoke about their abuse experiences in emotional and powerful victim impact statements. In the course of his professional career, Dr Nassar is alleged to have sexually abused approximately 256 female athletes from 1998 to 2015, often in front of parents. His victims were mainly gymnasts, some as young as 6 years of age. For some victims, the abuse occurred repetitively, up to 10 years in duration. Dr Nassar stated that his ‘medical treatments’ (which were invasive pelvic floor ‘therapy’ where he would digitally penetrate girls’ vaginas and anuses) would cure physical injuries. He abused them in his clinic, his home, at training camps and at competition venues where he treated them alone in his hotel room, often after having sedated the athlete with sleeping pills. Dr Nassar referred to himself as the ‘body whisperer’.1

What is unique about this sexual abuse case is that Dr Nassar is an osteopathic sport medicine physician. One of our colleagues. One of our fraternity. Larry was the physician for the USA Gymnastics team and worked at four Olympic Games. He was a practising sport medicine physician for a prestigious university in the NCAA collegiate system in the USA, the team physician for a national sport federation and a member of the US Olympic medical team; all coveted positions that connote success and accomplishment in our sport medicine culture. In these roles, the team physician is in a position of great privilege, responsibility and power.

What is sexual abuse in sport?

Sexual abuse in sport is defined by the IOC as ‘any conduct of a sexual nature, whether non-contact, contact or penetrative, where consent is coerced/manipulated or is not or cannot be given’.2 Consent for sexual activity does not apply to children given their inability to understand the concept.3 Sexual abuse has been categorised as a relational threat to child athletes. In the Nassar case, the abuse can also be classified as an organisational threat with the added complexity that the abuse included medical mismanagement4 (see table 1). From the published science in this field, we know that sexual abuse occurs at all levels of sport and in all sports,5 6 and that elite athletes have a higher prevalence.6 7 Child athletes are also particularly vulnerable with a prevalence rate of sexual abuse reported between 2% and 22%.8 Child athletes are considered to be at higher risk due to relocation from home to distant training facilities as well as separation and isolation from family and school communities caused by sport training demands.2 Finally, adolescent athletes are considered to be more vulnerable for sexual abuse due to the increased need for protection and supervision during this sensitive period of physical, psychological and social growth and development.9

Table 1

Categorisation of the various forms of violence which threaten child athletes.4

What are the impacts of sexual abuse?

The damage from the sexual abuse of Larry Nassar was apparent in the victim impact statements heard during his sentencing hearing. In her victim impact statement, Kyle Stephens stated:

Sexual abuse is so much more than a disturbing physical act. It changes the trajectory of a victim’s life, and that is something that nobody has the right to do.10

Jamie Dantzscher (2000 Olympic bronze medallist) described her challenges with depression, anorexia and bulimia requiring hospitalisation for attempted suicide.11 Chelsey Markham committed suicide in 2009, which her mother directly related to her sexual abuse by Dr Nassar.12 The victims described the physical pain, shame and embarrassment as well as the loss of their childhood. Kaylee Lorinez stated that she lost trust in physicians and is unable to tolerate physical touch.13 Whitney Mergens’ statement identified her parents as victims also.14 Kyle Stephens attributes her father’s suicide to her abuse at the hands of Dr Nassar.10 Randall Margraves, a father of three victims, had to be restrained from attacking Nassar during the court proceedings.15

The personal costs of abuse to athletes can be extremely damaging, long lasting and persist well after the abuse has ended.16 Sexual abuse affects athlete psychological, social and physical health.17 We know from the non-sport population that childhood sexual abuse is a predictor of poor mental health, self-harm and suicide attempts.18 In the sport sector, other mental health sequelae of sexual abuse include substance abuse, eating disorders and psychosomatic illnesses19 as well as psychological distress in adulthood and a reduction in self-reported quality of life.20 The psychological impact is compounded for the victim by what is known as the ‘bystander effect’, as described by Larry Nassar’s ‘army of survivors’ when discussing the inaction of the various sport organisations who turned a blind eye to these athletes when they tried to report their abuse.21 Unwanted pregnancy, sexual transmitted infections and urogenital/anogenital trauma are direct physical impacts of sexual abuse.2 Sexual abuse also has a negative effect on athlete performance, an increase risk of premature athlete dropout, doping and a willingness to cheat.22 Family members, teammates, friends and work colleagues can also be also negatively affected. For sport organisations, sexual abuse represents a significant risk for loss of sponsorship, early athlete dropout, reputational damage and a loss of both fans and talent pool.2

What went wrong?

How was Dr Nassar able to abuse for such a long time period? Why did no one stop him? How could the abuse reach such a magnitude of victims? These questions are poignant—for only by understanding how this tragedy occurred can we prevent a repetition of it in the future.

The recipe for Dr Nassar’s longstanding freedom to perpetrate can be explained as a melange of three key factors: (1) abuse of a power relationship, (2) a sport culture of secrecy and deference and (iii) failed sport leadership.

Sexual abuse occurs when there is an abuse of a power relationship.23 In this case, Dr Nassar was in a position of power over the athletes. His victims were vulnerable, young, injured female athletes. As part of his grooming process for the sexual abuse, he led the victims to believe that they were privileged to receive his care, and he lied to them that the sexual abuse was a form of legitimate medical treatment. He abused the trust that these athletes had in him as a physician.

Sexual abuse is fostered in a sport culture which denies, ignores or accepts abuse as the norm; a sport culture where athletes have no power or voice and are commodified in a ‘win at all costs’ environment. Sexual abuse is facilitated by a sport culture of secrecy and deference.24 Dominique Moceneau, 1996 Olympic gold medalist, describes the culture of USA Gymnastics as one of ‘psychological abuse’,25 which underpins all other forms of abuse, including sexual abuse.4 Psychological abuse often overlaps and co-exists with sexual abuse6 20—in reality, it is hard to imagine that sexual abuse could exist without a psychological abusive component. The culture of USA Gymnastics is described by Aly Raisman, six-time Olympic medalist, as one with a ‘winning is everything’ ethos: Their (USA gymnastics) biggest priority from the beginning and still today, is their reputation, the medals they win and the money they make off of us.’ 21

Sexual abuse in sport is considered to be the result of failed leadership. We know that sexual abuse occurs in a sport culture where there is high perpetrator motivation, low athlete protection (safeguarding policies and procedures) and high athlete vulnerability.2 Perpetrators seek out opportunities to abuse in environments where there is little supervision or oversight.26 Jordyn Wieber, an Olympic gold medallist (2012) and patient of Dr Nassars’ for 10 years, highlights this concept of failed leadership in her victim statement:

Larry Nassar is accountable. USA Gymnastics is accountable. The US Olympic Committee is accountable. My teammates and friends have been through enough, and now it’s time for change. The current gymnasts should not have to live in anxiety and fear as I did.27

USA Gymnastics demonstrated failed leadership in its lack of supervision of the National Team Training Centre in Texas, known as the Karolyi Ranch, which athletes have described as an emotionally abusive environment. USA Gymnastics delayed reporting the suspicion of sexual abuse for 5 weeks in 2015 and allegedly threatened athletes with a fine of US$100 000 if they were to speak out against Nassar. The organisation lacked athlete-safeguarding policies and procedures to handle allegations of abuse and had no mechanism to publically report abuse cases, thus enabling perpetrators to move locations and commence abuse in another gymnastics club. Until recently, there was no coach certification or training of USA Gymnastics officials in athlete safeguarding. Athletes were required by USA Gymnastics to see Dr Nassar for mandatory assessments, even after reports of abuse had been made. The President and entire Board of Directors of USA Gymnastics have since resigned over criticism of the mismanagement of the sexual abuse scandal.28

Michigan State University (MSU) was also implicated as culpable by Jordyn Weiber. Dr Nassar taught and practised medicine as an academic at this institution since 1997. Amanda Thomashow, a cheerleader at MSU, reported her abuse by Dr Nassar in 2014 and an ensuing inquiry cleared him of wrongdoing stating that his ‘treatments’ were appropriate medical therapy.29 Clearly, all institutions involved are experiencing reputational damage, and action is required to regain public and athlete confidence and to help to mitigate future recurrences.

Lessons learnt

It is incumbent on all of us in sport medicine to examine the details of the Nassar case to learn how to improve our practices to protect the athletes in our care from sexual abuse in sport. This begins with the acknowledgement of the underlying principle outlined in the IOC Consensus statement:

Athletes of all ages have a right to engage in ‘safe sport’: an athletic environment that is respectful, equitable and free from all forms of non-accidental violence to athletes. Everyone involved in sport will benefit from a sporting environment that is free from fear or favour, and are just as entitled to express their human rights in the context of sport as they are in any other setting.2

Safeguarding policies and procedures

It is also important for sport medicine physicians to ensure that all sport organisations we work with have safeguarding policies and procedures. Policies and procedures serve the purpose of safeguarding athletes, protecting the integrity of sport and sport organisations, protecting those working in sport and promoting the values of safe sport (see box 1). The IOC has created a toolkit to help sport organisations develop and implement athlete safeguarding policies and procedures.30

Box 1

Components of safe sport programs2

  • Clear policies on the rights of athletes to safe sport.

  • Associated codes of practice.

  • Systematic recruitment and background screening.

  • Education and training.

  • Complaint and support mechanisms.

  • Monitoring and evaluation systems.

In the Nassar abuse case, the victims were mostly child athletes during the time of the abuse. The International Safeguards for Children in Sport addresses the protection needs of children and acts as a resource to assist sport organisations in the development of child athlete-specific policies and procedures.31

Larry Nassar as an osteopathic sport medicine physician had additional codes of conduct that should have guided his behaviour. Related to the practice of medicine in general, there are regulations to protect the public from physician abuse. The oldest resource is the Hippocratic Oath which is taken by most physicians on their graduation from medical school. The original translation explicitly prohibits physicians from engaging in sexual conduct with patients: ‘Whatever houses I may visit, I will come for the benefit of the sick, remaining free of all intentional injustice, of all mischief and in particular of sexual relations with both female and male persons….’32 In most countries, physicians are bound by the legal codes of conduct mandated by local licensing bodies or Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons. In the USA, Dr Nassar was governed by the Code of Medical Ethics of the American Medical Association.33 Finally, sport medicine physicians are guided by the principles outlined in the Olympic Movement Medical Code.34 This document adapts the relevant human rights and ethical medical practices into the sport-specific context. Article 1.1.1 of the Olympic Movement Medical Code states that:

Athletes enjoy the same fundamental rights as all patients in their relationships with physicians and healthcare providers, in particular, respect for: a. their human dignity; b. their physical and psychological well-being; c. the protection of their health and safety; d. their self-determination; and e. their rights to privacy and confidentiality.34

The Olympic Movement Medical Code outlines the relationship boundaries between the sport medicine physician and athletes describing best practices with respect to health protection during training and competition, confidentiality, informed consent and privacy. The vulnerability of the growing child athlete to the physical, psychological and social health risks unique to the sport environment is also explicitly highlighted.34

Cultural change

Safe sport can only occur if there is a change in the culture of sport to one where athletes are respected and empowered to speak and influence change.2 Sport medicine physicians can play an integral role in advocating for athlete rights and in promoting safe sport by raising awareness through educational interventions. The IOC has developed two resources available for this purpose: (1) a coach and athlete interactive e-program on Sexual Harassment and Abuse in Sport35 and (2) an athlete e-course called ‘safeguarding athletes from harassment and abuse’ found in the IOC Athlete Learning Gateway portal.36

Medical management of sexual abuse 

When I learnt of the Larry Nassar case, I contacted a colleague who was a member of the US Olympic medical team. He asked the questions that many of us in sport medicine might have been thinking: What should I have noticed in the abused gymnasts? What should I do if an athlete discloses abuse? One important lesson learnt from Larry Nassar is that clinical competency in the ability to identify and manage sexual abuse should be included in sport medicine fellowship training programmes.37

‘Clinical competency in the ability to identify and manage sexual abuse should be included in sport medicine fellowship training programmes.’

Despite the fact that most sport medicine fellowship programmes do not train competencies in this field, it behoves all of us in the field to have a clinical approach for the identification and management of sexual abuse. To being with, we should be able to recognise the signs and symptoms of abuse in sport. As athletes are often silenced by their abuse, they are reluctant and frightened to disclose. As a result, as a team doctor, we should be vigilant to recognise the physical, psychological, behavioural and sport performance indicators of sexual abuse as described in the ‘impacts’ section above. Having a high index of suspicion and verifying athlete safety if concerned is recommended. Should an athlete disclose abuse to you, box 2 outlines a ‘best practice’ clinical approach to follow.

Box 2

Clinical approach to athlete disclosures of sexual abuse40

  • Actively and empathetically listening to and psychologically supporting the patient/athlete.

  • Acknowledge his/her courage in speaking about this abuse.

  • Assure the athlete that this experience is not their fault.

  • Simultaneously encourage disclosure and yet avoid leading questions.

  • To facilitate this disclosure and to demonstrate trust in the athlete, the sport doctor should not denigrate the perpetrator.

  • Keep accurate record completion.

  • STOP the abuse: report the disclosure to the appropriate authorities, legal statues, sport organisation.

  • Ensure athlete safety.

  • With a multidisciplinary treatment team, investigate and manage any associated medical (physical or psychological) presentations.

  • Support team mates, members of the entourage and family members.


As outlined in the BMJ Opinion blog of 29 March9, 2018, ‘The Larry Nassar tragedy—never again’,38 we as sport medicine physicians must act to ensure that our athletes feel safe and respected and that we can be trusted to act in the best interest of their physical and psychological health. May Dr Nassar be a wakeup call to our profession to ensure that we are not found guilty of the famous anonymous quote, ‘History repeats itself because no one was listening the first time’. By speaking up and being an integral part of change, we as sport medicine physicians should strive to create a safe sport environment for our athletes. While it is difficult to hear the impact statements of the victims of Larry Nassar, we must learn from them, and as a legacy to their suffering, we cannot allow another similar tragedy to occur.

That you still think that somehow you are right that you are a doctor and you are entitled and you don’t have to listen and that you did treatment. I would not send my dogs to you, sir. There is no treatment here.39 Judge Rosemarie Aquilina

***For more information on sexual abuse in sport, please listen to the BJSM podcast:


This editorial is dedicated to the numerous victims abused by Dr Larry Nassar; the brave young women who found the courage to speak up to ensure that generations of athletes to follow will be better protected as young women in elite sport. May their actions serve to facilitate their own healing and as a wake-up call for sport organisations and sport medicine communities to ensure safe sport for all. Finally, I would like to acknowledge the pioneering work in this field of Professor Celia Brackenridge, who laboured and lobbied tirelessly throughout her career to protect athletes from harassment and abuse in sport.



  • Contributors MM contributed to the conception and design, drafting and revising the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Author note ‘Only by speaking out can we create lasting change’. Stokes D. (accessed 18 Feb 2018).