Background Substances from various classes may be used for recreational purposes, self-treatment or to boost performance. When substance use shifts from occasional to regular, heavy or hazardous use, positive and negative effects can develop that vary by substance class and athlete. Regular use of recreational or performance enhancing substances can lead to misuse, sanctions or use disorders.
Objective To review the prevalence, patterns of use, risk factors, performance effects and types of intervention for all classes of recreational and performance enhancing substances in elite athletes by sport, ethnicity, country and gender.
Methods A comprehensive search was conducted to identify studies that compared the prevalence and patterns of substance use, misuse and use disorders in elite athletes with those of non-athletes and provided detailed demographic and sport variations in reasons for use, risk factors and performance effects for each main substance class.
Results Alcohol, cannabis, tobacco (nicotine) and prescribed opioids and stimulants are the most commonly used substances in elite athletes, but generally used at lower rates than in non-athletes. In contrast, use/misuse rates for binge alcohol, oral tobacco, non-prescription opioids and anabolic-androgenic steroids are higher among athletes than non-athletes, especially in power and collision sports. Cannabis/cannabinoids seem to have replaced nicotine as the second most commonly used substance.
Conclusions Substance use in elite athletes varies by country, ethnicity, gender, sport and competitive level. There are no studies on substance use disorder prevalence in elite male and female athletes and few studies with direct comparison groups.
- drug use
- elite performance
- prohibited substance
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors DM, TS, JMC-M, MEH, BH and CLR helped perform the literature search and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. DM, CLR and BH had the idea for the article and DM is the guarantor. Each author’s contribution to the paper is listed and described below. All authors are in agreement with the content of the manuscript. DM: review of the literature; conception, design, construction and interpretation of the study; construction of the article; revision of the article; final approval. TS: review of the literature; interpretation; construction of the article; revision of the article; final approval. JMC-M: review of the literature; interpretation; construction of the article; revision of the article; final approval. MEH: construction of the article; revision of the article; final approval. BH: review of the literature; construction of the article; revision of the article; final approval. CLR: review of the literature; interpretation; conception and design of the study; construction of the article, revision of the article; final approval.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.