Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Is it time to give population health surveillance a late fitness test?
  1. Gavin Sandercock,
  2. Ben Jones
  1. School of Sport Rehabilitation and Exercise Science, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Gavin Sandercock, School of Sport Rehabilitation and Exercise Science, University of Essex, Colchester CO43SQ , UK; gavins{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Tomkinson et al 1 report temporal trends in aerobic fitness of 1 142 026 children aged 7–19 years old using estimates from the 20 m shuttle run. The data show continued declines in fitness described as ‘indicative of declines in population health’. The authors propose that surveillance of children’s fitness should be undertaken within ‘harmonised national health surveys’. The authors’ convictions in the potential value of extending paediatric health surveillance to include fitness measures will be shared by readers who recognise the utility of fitness testing performed routinely for diagnostic screening and athlete monitoring.2

Aerobic fitness is a stronger predictor of mortality than established cardiovascular disease risk factors.3 Medicine acknowledges the diagnostic utility of exercise tests, but their tendency to ‘focus on the ischemic ST-segment3 may explain why aerobic fitness is so rarely reported as an outcome in the medical literature (figure 1). The American Heart Association’s call for a US national fitness registry4 echoed recently the authors’5 proposal for a repository of children’s shuttle-run data to ‘enable temporal tracking and improve health surveillance’.

Figure 1

Health outcomes reported in the leading …

View Full Text


  • Contributors GS had the initial idea and wrote the elements that relate to the paper under discussion (which he reviewed). BJ wrote the sections on practice on sports medicine. Both authors finalised the draft paper.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles