Statistics from Altmetric.com
As presented in the first editorial from this series, the Tokyo Olympics are expected to be the hottest in modern history.1 While the postponing from 2020 to 2021 will not change the period of the year, it will allow more time for athletes to plan for multiple heat acclimation camps. Indeed, heat acclimation is the most important countermeasure athletes can adopt to protect their health and enhance performance.2 Heat acclimation develops following repeated training in hot conditions in response to marked increases in core and skin temperature, skin blood flow and sweat rate.2 It is commonly accepted that daily training in the heat for 60–90 min for 2 weeks allows for adaptations to occur, including plasma volume expansion and enhanced heat dissipation.3 These adaptations contribute to lower the cardiovascular response associated with exercising in the heat and thus improve performance.3 The time course of these adaptations is relatively rapid with a large fraction of adaptations occurring during the first week of training in the heat and the remaining adaptations developing during the second week,4 although a large interindividual variability exists in the magnitude and time frame of the adaptive process.5
While the above principles are relatively well understood, a common question from coaching and medical teams is how to integrate heat acclimation within the training and taper programme of elite athletes. Laboratory and field studies have shown that performance is increased after 1 or 2 weeks of training in the heat6; however, it may be impractical for athletes to dedicate 2 weeks to training daily in the heat immediately before a major event. Indeed, the thermal and cardiovascular strain necessary to induce the required adaptations may interfere with the workload programmed within the training schedule, as well as impede recovery during the taper period, or disrupt travel arrangements. Notwithstanding, two points are important to clarify. First, the daily heat exposures (which can be passive) required to induce heat acclimation are relatively short, which allow athletes the opportunity to train and rest in cool environments. Second, the decay of acclimation appears to be slower than its induction,4 which lends itself to be performed in advanced of competition and supplemented by a short ‘top-up’ prior to competition.7
The approach of heat acclimating in advance is further supported by the rebound effect of re-acclimation, wherein a second acclimation period within a month of the initial one allows for faster and in some cases more profound adaptations.4 For example, Weller et al 8 showed that following an initial 10-day acclimation period, 2 and 4 days of re-acclimation after 12 and 26 days without heat exposure (ie, decay) were sufficient to regain a similar acclimation status (figure 1). A recent meta-analyses also estimated that ~35% of the heart rate, ~30% of the sweat rate and ~36% of the core temperature adaptations are lost in the 2 weeks following heat acclimation.4 However, regular exercise–heat exposure during this period decreases the rate of decay. Passive heat exposure may also be used during this period to accommodate travel and/or taper requirements, all the while providing the stimulus to maintain adaptation. A re-acclimation period of 29 to 510 days closer to competition would then be sufficient to regain adaptation, with an extended re-acclimation period potentially allowing for further adaptations to develop.11
In summary, it is imperative to heat acclimate before participating in prolonged events in the heat to protect the health and optimise the performance of athletes.2 Thus, an athlete preparing for Tokyo or any other competition in hot/humid ambient conditions may wish to plan an initial heat acclimation camp 4 weeks before the Olympics and subsequently maintain or minimise the decay in adaptations with regular exercise or passive heat exposure until travelling (eg, once every 3 days). This would allow a fast re-acclimation on arrival at the competition venue.
This editorial was inspired by discussions with numerous coaches across the year.
Twitter @ephysiol, @DrJPeriard
Contributors SR and JP wrote this editorial.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.