Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Multimorbidity and the paucity of effective treatments
People with multimorbidity (two or more medical conditions) have poorer physical and psychosocial health and higher risk of hospital admission and premature death.1 The complexity and increased burden of multimorbidity presents challenges for healthcare systems.2 Therefore, the current standard of care for patients with multimorbidity includes visiting many healthcare professionals and reviewing different pharmacological treatments with inherent risk of side effects. This is often unsatisfactory for the patients.3
The potential role of exercise
Exercise is considered a core treatment for at least 26 chronic conditions. However, little is known about its effects in people with multimorbidity. To fill this gap, we performed a systematic review of randomised controlled trials to investigate the benefits and harms of exercise therapy (ie, a regimen or plan of physical activities designed and prescribed for specific therapeutic goals with the purpose of restoring normal physical function or to reduce symptoms caused by diseases or injuries) in multimorbidity.4 We included studies with 80% or more participants having at least two of the following common chronic conditions: osteoarthritis, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, depression, heart failure, ischaemic heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.4 These conditions are among the leading causes of global disability, often coexist, have shared risk factors and pathogenesis5 and have a negative impact on physical and psychosocial health.
Benefits and harms of exercise therapy in people with multimorbidity
Twenty-three studies from 17 countries examined exercise interventions in different settings and included 3363 people (median age=65, IQR=58–71). The most common combinations of conditions were heart failure and depression, type 2 diabetes and depression, and hypertension and type 2 diabetes. The exercise therapy programmes were at least partly supervised, included aerobic and/or strengthening exercise and were performed two to three times a week for 12 weeks (on average).
Exercise therapy improved health-related quality of life (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.37, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.61) and objectively measured physical function (SMD 0.33, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.49) and reduced depression (SMD −0.80, 95% CI −1.21 to −0.40) and anxiety symptoms (SMD −0.49, 95% CI −0.99 to 0.01). Additionally, exercise therapy was not associated with an increased risk of non-serious adverse events (risk ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.76), such as musculoskeletal pain and falls. By contrast, it appeared to reduce the risk of serious adverse events such as hospitalisation and pneumonia (risk ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.78)4 (figure 1). However, future studies including people with different combinations of conditions, with exercise therapy interventions tailored to people’s goals and preferences and selection of primary outcome measures that are important to patients, are needed to improve the confidence in these results.
Our systematic review found that exercise therapy seems safe and beneficial for people with multimorbidity (as defined in our study), as for patients with single chronic conditions, hence, it should be considered as a treatment option. People with multimorbidity can expect to improve their psychosocial and physical health by exercising two to three times a week regardless of the combinations of conditions we investigated.
Contributors AB wrote the first draft of the manuscript and designed the first draft of the infographic. All the authors contributed to revise the final manuscript and infographic.
Funding European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (MOBILIZE, grant agreement number 801790), Næstved, Slagelse and Ringsted Hospitals’ Research Fund and The Association of Danish Physiotherapists Research Fund.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.