Article Text

Download PDFPDF

282 A ‘step’ towards prevention of OA in physically active amputees using a novel foot prosthesis: a randomised controlled cross-over trial
  1. Phoebe Runciman1,4,
  2. John Cockcroft2,3,
  3. Wayne Derman3,4
  1. 1Department of Sport Science, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
  2. 2Central Analytic Facility, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
  3. 3Institute of Sport and Exercise Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
  4. 4IOC Research Center, Pretoria, South Africa


Background Individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation (UTTA) have higher external ground reaction forces in joints on their sound side during gait and this been linked to increased risk of osteoarthritis in these individuals.

Objective To describe the biomechanical characteristics in UTTA whilst using a novel, mechanically powered energy storing and returning (ESAR) ankle/foot prosthesis, compared with two control foot prostheses.

Design Randomised cross-over trial.

Setting Laboratory based study.

Participants 20 participants performed a standardized self-paced walking gait protocol using three different ankle/foot prostheses (novel ESAR foot (NOVEL), current gold standard ESAR (ESAR) foot and solid-ankle cushioned-heel (SACH) foot), in a randomised cross-over design.

Assessment of Risk Factors Three-dimensional kinematics of the lower body as well as ground reaction forces (GRF) were recorded with a ten-camera stereophotogrammetry motion capture system and three floor-imbedded force plates.

Main Outcome Measurements GRFs, external adduction moments (EAM) & ankle range of motion (ROM)

Results Despite similar peak GRFs between feet on the prosthetic side during walking (± 108% body weight), there were higher GRFs on the sound side during the load acceptance phase whilst participants used the SACH (126.3 ± 11.5%) and ESAR (116.8 ± 10.5%) feet, but not the NOVEL (108.7 ± 9.3%, p<0.001). External Abduction Moments (EAM) observed on the sound side during loading was 0.55 ± 0.3 Nm/kg, 0.6 ± 0.3 Nm/kg and 0.7± 0,31 Nm/kg for the NOVEL, ESAR and SACH. The NOVEL had a sagittal ROM of 21.4 ± 3.2o, the ESAR 18.2 ± 3.3oand the SACH 8.4 ± 2.3o(p<0.001).

Conclusions The use of the NOVEL foot resulted in a similar loading/force pattern between prosthetic and sound sides in UTTA, which was not seen with the two other foot prostheses. Furthermore, participants demonstrated a better transition during double support, with improved ROM, and EAM, whilst using the NOVEL.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.