Article Text

Download PDFPDF

379 Maximising the relevance and dissemination of the IOC medical consensus statements: key stakeholder’s perceptions of the IOC medical consensus statements in a developed country (Australia)
  1. Marelise Badenhorst2,
  2. Lauren Fortington1,
  3. Caroline Bolling4,
  4. Kati Pasanen5,
  5. Wayne Derman2,
  6. Evert Verhagen4,
  7. Martin Schwellnus3,
  8. Carolyn Emery5,
  9. Caroline Finch1
  1. 1Australian Centre for Research into Injury in Sport and its Prevention (ACRISP), School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia
  2. 2Insitute of Sport and Exercise Medicine, University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa
  3. 3Sport, Exercise Medicine and Lifestyle Institute (SEMLI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
  4. 4Amsterdam Collaboration on Health and Safety in Sports, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  5. 5Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada


Background The IOC Medical and Scientific commission’s mission is to provide a guiding reference for sports organisations on issues relating to the protection of the health of athletes. One strategy to achieve this mission is through supporting the development of consensus statements.

Objective This study investigates the relevance and dissemination of the IOC consensus statements among sports medicine professionals directly involved in Olympic athlete health in a developed setting (Australia).

Design Qualitative case study.

Methods Semi-structured interviews, document analysis and field notes were utilised. Seven sports medicine professionals were interviewed.

Results For clinicians (not active in an academic/research setting), knowledge of the statements was limited; invitation to the study was the first awareness of the statements. Participants in leadership roles (with an academic/research component) were generally more familiar with some, but not all, statements. Participants identified a wealth of competing information sources through professional networks in health and sport. Subsequently, participants tend to consider these other avenues as first access point for information. Where statements were identified and used, there were several benefits reported, particularly drawn from the perceived leadership, trust, brand and reach of the IOC. While there is no formal adoption process for the information contained within a consensus statement, where identified as relevant, the information is shared amongst peer networks, via email or face-to-face meetings/seminars. There was agreement that the IOC has a role in the development and dissemination of the statements. However, interviewees also stated that information that is current and tailored to the target audiences (clinicians, coaches or athletes) could enhance the IOC’s objective of guiding reference on athlete health.

Conclusions A wealth of information is available to sports medicine professionals in Australia. Therefore, to enhance relevance and dissemination in a developed country, the IOC consensus statements must remain current and be tailored to target audiences.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.