Article Text

Download PDFPDF

439 Bumbled vibration: 144 Hz vibration does not enhance shoulder control
  1. Amber Winton,
  2. Nicholas Andriani,
  3. Erica Marshall,
  4. James Lynch
  1. Florida Southern College, Lakeland, FL, USA


Background Stability of the upper extremity is critical for injury prevention. Vibration may improve proprioception, reducing injury risk. However, traditional vibration methods may be expensive and require a significant level of skill by the technician.

Objective Our purpose was to investigate whether an acute bout of shoulder exercise performed with an inexpensive, user-friendly vibration toy ball (BumbleBall, Cardinal Laboratories) improves shoulder position sense and joint control.

Design Participants completed an acute bout of shoulder exercise with and without vibration on separate visits. Prior to the exercise bout, participants were assessed for motion sway (path length) using a custom iPhone application previously shown reliable. Path length was reassessed following the exercise bout. A 2-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine differences between conditions (vibration/no vibration) and time (pre/post). Significant main effects were examined using paired t-tests - p <0.05.

Setting Liberal arts undergraduate institution.

Patients (or Participants) Thirty subjects (age 18–22) completed all trials. Subject level of activity ranged from non-athletes to collegiate athletes. Exclusion criterion was an upper extremity injury in the previous month.

Interventions (or Assessment of Risk Factors) Sessions started with an app measure. Each subject held the phone on the palm, arm forward at eye level for 20 seconds each arm for all trials. Each subject then completed a full can exercise set with the randomly assigned BumbleBall state (vibration/no vibration), and then repeated the app stability measure. The toy vibrates at 144 Hertz with an amplitude of 8 mm.

Main Outcome Measurements Average path length before and after use of the BumbleBall (vibration/no vibration) assessed this intervention.

Results There was a significant (p=0.009 and ηp 2=0.27) main effect of time. There were no significant (p>0.05) 2-way interactions between condition and time.

Conclusions The vibration of this inexpensive toy at 144 Hz did not improve shoulder proprioception.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.