You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 55, Issue Suppl 1
  • 459 Knowledge of the importance of proper tackle contact techniques does not translate to proper tackle contact technique for injury prevention and performance

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Poster Presentations
459 Knowledge of the importance of proper tackle contact techniques does not translate to proper tackle contact technique for injury prevention and performance
Free
  1. Steve den Hollander1,
  2. Mike Lambert1,
  3. Ben Jones1,2,3,
  4. Sharief Hendricks1,2
  1. 1Division of Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, the University of Cape Town and the Sports Science Institute of South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa
  2. 2Institute for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK, Leeds, UK
  3. 3School of Science and Technology, University of New England, NSW, Australia, Armidale, Australia

Abstract

Background In rugby union and sevens, the tackle is the most frequently occurring contact event and carries the greatest risk of causing injury. Proper tackle technique has been shown to reduce the risk of injury during the tackle and increase likelihood of success. As such, national rugby injury prevention programmes aim to provide coaches, trainers and players with knowledge of proper tackle technique. This knowledge is intended to modify players behaviours towards safety in the tackle, and ultimately improve their tackle technique in training and matches.

Objectives To determine the association between knowledge of the importance of proper tackle contact techniques and actual proper tackle contact technique for injury prevention and performance.

Design Cross-sectional study design.

Participants Fifty-three (n=53) academy rugby players participated in this study, and a total of 211 tackles were analysed.

Assessment of Risk Factors Knowledge and attitudes of proper contact technique for injury prevention and performance for both the ball-carrier and tackler were determined using a questionnaire. In training, players performed four ball-carries into contact and four tackles using a validated tackle drill. Thereafter, technical proficiency for the ball-carrier and tackler were scored using a standardised technical criteria.

Main Outcome Measurements Knowledge and attitude score for proper tackle contact technique for injury prevention and performance, technical proficiency score for the ball-carrier and tackler.

Results No association was found between player knowledge of the importance of techniques and actual tackle contact technique in training for both injury prevention (tackler r=-0.02, p=0.90; ball-carrier r=-0.26, p=0.06) and performance (tackler r=0.02, p=0.86; ball-carrier r=-0.13, p=0.38).

Conclusions This study reveals the gap between players’ declarative knowledge of safe and effective techniques and their procedural knowledge of how to execute proper techniques. This gap supports the argument that injury prevention programmes should not be limited to educational strategies only, and should include practical coaching components.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2021-IOC.420

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.