Article Text

Download PDFPDF

463 Can we prevent injuries in recreational runners? A randomized controlled trial
Free
  1. Kyra Cloosterman1,
  2. Tryntsje Fokkema1,2,
  3. Robert-Jan de Vos3,
  4. Edwin Visser4,
  5. Patrick Krastman1,5,
  6. John IJzerman6,
  7. Bart Koes1,7,
  8. Jan Verhaar3,
  9. Sita Bierma-Zeinstra1,3,
  10. Marienke van Middelkoop1
  1. 1Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  2. 2Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
  3. 3Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  4. 4Department of Physical Therapy, Sportgeneeskunde Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  5. 5Rotterdam Marathon Study Group, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  6. 6Dutch Athletic Federation, Arnhem, Netherlands
  7. 7Center for Muscle and Joint Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

Abstract

Background The INSPIRE trial examined in 2017 the effect of an online injury prevention program on the number of running-related injuries (RRI). Although this program showed no effect on the number of injuries, new insights from this study were used to design an enhanced prevention program.

Objective To examine the effectiveness of an online injury prevention program on the number of RRIs in recreational runners.

Design Randomized controlled trial.

Setting This study includes analyses of a randomized controlled trial on RRI prevention in recreational runners registered for a Dutch running event (distances 10–42.195 km).

Participants 4105 adult, recreational runners who registered at least two months before the running event and did not participate in the INSPIRE trial.

Interventions Participants that were randomized into the intervention group were given access to the online ‘10 steps 2 outrun injuries’ prevention program, which included 10 steps with advice to prevent RRIs. Participants received three follow-up questionnaires: one month and one week before the registered running event and one month after the running event.

Main Outcome Measurements The number of new RRIs in the intervention and control group during follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included the injury proportions in participants per injury location and in participants with an RRI in the 12 months before baseline.

Results During follow-up, 35.5% (95% CI 33.5;37.6) of the participants in the intervention group sustained a new RRI compared to 35.4% (95% CI 33.3;37.5) of the participants in the control group, with no differences between groups (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.90;1.17). No significant differences in injury proportions were found in participants per injury location and in participants with an RRI in the 12 months before baseline.

Conclusions An enhanced online injury prevention program including 10 steps to outrun injuries had no effect on the number of RRIs in recreational runners.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.