Article Text

Download PDFPDF

164 Normative baseline SCAT5 scores in a population of United States olympic athletes
Free
  1. Lauren Pierpoint1,5,
  2. Laura Zdziarski2,5,
  3. David Taylor3,5,
  4. William Moreau4,
  5. Dustin Nabhan3,5
  1. 1Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, USA
  2. 2University of Utah, Department of Orthopaedics, Salt Lake City, USA
  3. 3USA Olympic and Paralympic Committee, Colorado Springs, USA
  4. 4Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, USA
  5. 5USA Coalition for the Prevention of Illness and Injury in Sport, Colorado Springs, USA

Abstract

Background The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition (SCAT5) is the most recent version of the concussion evaluation tool used by clinicians to evaluate athletes with suspected concussions.

Objective To describe normative baseline SCAT5 scores among United States Olympic athletes.

Design Retrospective descriptive epidemiology.

Setting United States Olympic and Paralympic Sports Medicine Centers.

Participants Two hundred fifty-seven Olympic athletes (48.2% female, mean age ± standard deviation (SD) = 22.5±4.8 years) representing 19 sport federations underwent baseline SCAT5 testing between April 2018 and July 2019.

Main Outcome Measurements Baseline SCAT5 scores of healthy Olympic athletes. T-tests were used to compare scores by sex.

Results Athletes reported a mean of 4.0±4.9 symptoms (median=2, IQR=0–6) with an average severity score of 7.9±12.3 (median=2, interquartile range=0–10). Most (71.8%) athletes reported never having sustained a concussion prior to testing; 17.5% reported one prior concussion (range=0–10 reported concussions). Mean scores ± SD for major components of the SCAT5: 4.8±0.53 for orientation, 20.7±4.0 for immediate memory, 3.8±1.3 for concentration, 4.0±4.2 for balance, 6.9±1.9 for delayed recall, and 12.4±3.0 for Standardized Assessment of Concussion. No sex differences were observed for concussion history or the number and severity of current symptoms. Females scored higher than males in the immediate memory (21.7 vs. 19.8, p<0.001), orientation (4.9 vs. 4.8, p=0.047), and delayed recall tasks (7.3 vs. 6.5, p=0.001).

Conclusions Normative values for baseline SCAT5 performance are presented for a population of healthy Olympic athletes. This information can be considered by clinicians interpreting SCAT5 results in athletes who do not have a known baseline score.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.