Article Text

Download PDFPDF

166 How do we do better? Managing community rugby concussions in a primary care setting
  1. Danielle Salmon1,
  2. Janelle Romanchuk1,
  3. Ian Murphy1,
  4. John S Sullivan2,
  5. Simon Walters3,
  6. Chris Whatman3,
  7. Sierra Keung3,
  8. Amanda Clacy4
  1. 1New Zealand Rugby, Wellington, New Zealand
  2. 2Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
  3. 3Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand, School of Sport and Recreation, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
  4. 4Sunshine Coast Mind and Neuroscience – Thompson Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Birtinya, Australia


Background Concussions in rugby are of a global player welfare concern. To address this challenge New Zealand Rugby has employed a social ecological model to develop a concussion management pathway (CMP). Following a suspected concussion, the pathway encourages compliance and supports the relevant stakeholders (e.g. players, coaches, physiotherapists, doctors) throughout the recovery process.

Objective To examine (i) user uptake of technology that operationalises the CMP and (ii) stakeholder experiences.

Design Prospective mixed-methods multi-centre study.

Setting Community rugby in three New Zealand provincial unions.

Patients (or Participants) Community rugby male and female players (n=1893) were invited to participate of which 1540 provided pre-season baseline data.

Interventions (or Assessment of Risk Factors) Pre-season, players were baseline tested using a modified SCAT5. In season, suspected concussions were logged on an App, notifying relevant stakeholders and entering the player into the CMP. Players were referred to a doctor who assessed them for a concussion while comparing to the player’s baseline assessment via a customized online portal. This information was also used by the doctor at the time of medical clearance. To gain a deeper understanding of the participants’ experience with the CMP, 130 stakeholders were interviewed post-season.

Results Two-hundred suspected concussions were logged, of these 154 saw a doctor for a diagnosis, 171 obtained medical clearance following completion of GRTP, and 17 were referred on for further investigation/treatment by a doctor involved in the pilot.

Stakeholders agreed that having a clearly defined pathway facilitated an efficient and informed management process for concussions and encouraged compliance with seeking medical advice/clearance.

Conclusions The CMP provides an electronic platform for monitoring compliance with medical visits and the safe RTP while ensuring all stakeholders are aware of the player’s status. The system provides controlled access to centrally stored baseline information to help inform medical decisions. Stakeholders supported the use of the CMP.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.