Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
A need for greater international collaboration and transparency
Advances in science, and how it is performed, has evolved in recent decades. Science has moved from individualistic approaches, to a worldwide integrated process. This has been optimistically termed a ‘global college,’ with international collaboration now the standard.1 Scientific advances, most noticeably in computing power and data collection, have created quantities of data that would have been previously inconceivable.2 Sports medicine care has continued to evolve, but there is further clear opportunity to improve care decisions and provide trustworthy information, for our athletes.3 Concerted efforts to create an open science environment, can leverage the resources at our disposal, helping athlete health and performance. Open science enables data to be findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable to independently assess, reproduce and perform to permit new independent research.4 This editorial aims to contextualise the value of open science, specifically sharing data publication and distribution, to sports medicine clinicians and researchers and its contribution to evaluating the quality research.
Aggregated clinical findings have added some value but further progress is needed
For decades, the medical literature has been regarded as having generally poor methods,5 leading to inadequate conclusions.5 6 Systematic review and …
Footnotes
Twitter @DRGSBullock, @soccerPT11, @docandrewmurray
Contributors GSB, PW, FMI and SK conceived the study idea. GSB, PW, AJHA, FMI and SK were involved in design and planning. GSB, PW and SK wrote the first draft of the manuscript. GSB, PW, SP, AJHA, AM, FMI and SK critically revised the manuscript. GSB, PW, SP, AJHA, AM, FMI and SK approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.