Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Acute respiratory illness (ARI) is the most common reason athletes seek acute medical care and represents a significant challenge to the sport and exercise medicine (SEM) clinician working ‘in the field’.1 Faced with this issue, there is a need to determine if symptoms are caused by an acute respiratory infection (ARInf), establish if a specific antimicrobial treatment is indicated, evaluate the risk of transmission and provide appropriate advice regarding the safety of ongoing sports participation.
Recent technological advances now offer clinicians the ability to rapidly (ie, in less than an hour) analyse respiratory samples and identify the presence of pathogens via genetic signatures. This approach, with molecular respiratory point-of-care testing (ResPOCT), can now be used not only for SARS-CoV-2 but also a panel of common pathogens causing respiratory infections, including viruses (eg, rhinovirus, seasonal coronaviruses, influenza viruses, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)) and some bacteria (eg, Bordetella pertussis, Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae).
The accuracy and validity of ResPOCT have been tested against laboratory-based methods and are increasingly being used in ‘out-of-hospital’ settings.2 3 Moreover, the development of more versatile and portable devices should prompt the logical question of whether this approach should be deployed more widely to enhance the care provided to athletes. This commentary discusses the potential role and ongoing knowledge gaps regarding ResPOCT in athletes.
ResPOCT in the assessment of an athlete with suspected ARinf—what do we know?
Four studies4–7 have provided detailed insight regarding the deployment of ResPOCT in an SEM context. These studies have demonstrated that ResPOCT can be used successfully …
Footnotes
Contributors JHH (guarantor) conceived the editorial and created a first draft. All authors contributed equally to subsequent revisions.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests JHH and MS are on the BJSM Editorial Board.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.