Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Sport healthcare and performance support practitioners require data to inform clinical and performance decisions, identify risk factors and investigate the efficacy and effectiveness of different interventions.1 Data sharing is a key component to improve sport healthcare decisions and initiatives, particularly in identifying and tackling systemic health priorities. However, sport healthcare data sharing practices are extremely limited due to little uptake and incentives, which inhibits knowledge growth, evidence synthesis and research progress.1 Incorporating open science practices into sport healthcare can increase the efficiency and quality of research,2 transparency,3 and promote public trust4 in the research process, results and implementation.
There are many facets to adopting an open science framework with data sharing being a key component (table 1). However, barriers to creating open and accessible data exist and can be operationalised at four levels: (1) individual researcher; (2) publishing (ie, journals); (3) organisational support (ie, universities, sports leagues and governing bodies and grant funding bodies) and (4) governance and security. This editorial aims to contextualise the barriers of open and accessible data in sport health and provide potential solutions which account for the unique culture and environment of sport healthcare and performance providers.
- In this window
- In a new window
Individual barriers to open and accessible data
Scientists have reported multiple barriers to data sharing, including time constraints and knowledge …
Footnotes
Twitter @DRGSBullock, @dt_hughes, @soccerPT11, @docsoph
Correction notice This article has been corrected since it published Online First. The affiliation details have been corrected for author Tom Hughes.
Contributors GSB, PW and FMI conceived the article idea. GSB, PW and FMI defined the contents of the article. GSB, PW and FMI wrote the initial draft. GSB, PW, SK, TH, ES, AJHA, CR, SN, RDR, GSC and FMI critically revised the manuscript. GSB, PW, SK, TH, ES, AJHA, CR, SN, RDR, GSC and FMI approved the manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.