Article Text

Download PDFPDF
3.19 Working together: New Zealand Rugby’s national concussion management pathway for community rugby union
  1. Danielle Salmon1,
  2. S John Sullivan1,
  3. Jason Chua1,
  4. Simon Walters1,
  5. Chris Whatman2,
  6. Janelle Romanchuk1,
  7. Rasmussen Karen1,
  8. Murphy Ian1,
  9. Johna Register-Mahalik3,
  10. Clacy Amanda4
  1. 1New Zealand Rugby, Wellington, New Zealand
  2. 2Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand, School of Sport and Recreation, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
  3. 3Exercise and Sport Science/Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
  4. 4Sunshine Coast Mind and Neuroscience – Thompson Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Birtinya, Australia

Abstract

Objective To explore compliance with an electronically facilitated concussion management pathway (CMP) that operationalises the current community rugby recommendations.

Design Prospective mixed-methods study.

Setting Three provincial unions.

Participants Community male and female rugby players (n=1540).

Interventions (or Assessment of Risk Factors) The CMP comprised of an App that recorded players’ baseline assessment, derived from elements of the SCAT5, logged ‘suspected’ concussions, notified stakeholders about the ‘suspected’ concussion and triggered a referral to a general practitioner (GP) for assessment. GPs could review players’ assessment history at the time of diagnosis and medical clearance through a web-portal linked to the App.

Outcome Measures To determine players’ compliance with the recommended steps in the CMP following a suspected concussion, all interactions with the App and web-portal were documented and all stakeholders were interviewed post-season.

Main Results 200 ‘suspected’ concussions were reported over the 2019 season with 142 of these logged. Of these, 108 were confirmed via a medical diagnosis with 103 subsequently being medically cleared. Ten diagnoses were obtained at ED; baseline assessments were used for comparison in 75% of the diagnosis and medical clearance assessments. A strong theme that emerged from the interviews was the value of a clearly defined process. One stakeholder reported, ‘This [CMP] makes a difference to players, to the game … New Zealand Rugby has stood-up and said ‘we’ve recognised a problem, we’re being proactive and starting at the grassroots.’

Conclusions The use of technology to operationalise the recommended CMP resulted in a strong uptake and compliance in community rugby. This information is being used to refine the CMP processes.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.