Article Text

Download PDFPDF
2.21 The level of agreement and nature of disagreements between the detection of suspected concussions in the field and initial physician diagnosis
  1. Amélie Tremblay1,
  2. Claude Goulet2,
  3. Kathryn Schneider3,4,5,
  4. Stacy Sick3,
  5. Victor Lun6,
  6. Carolyn A Emery3,4,5,
  7. Pierre Frémont1
  1. 1Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, QUEBEC, Canada
  2. 2Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Education, Université Laval, QUEBEC, Canada
  3. 3Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
  4. 4Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
  5. 5Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Canada
  6. 6University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

Abstract

Background and Objectives Following the detection of a suspected concussion, diagnosis by a physician is recommended. The objectives were 1) to determine the level of agreement between detection of a suspected concussion and subsequent physician diagnosis, and 2) to assess the risk associated with situations of disagreement.

Design and Outcomes This is a pilot sub-study of the SHRed Concussions program and reports on sport-related concussions documented before 28/02/2022 in 13–17 year-old participants. Cohen’s kappa (K) was used to examine agreement between detection and the physician’s diagnosis. When other diagnoses were identified, the nature and potential for medical complications were described.

Results Of 166 cases of suspected concussion, 162 concussion diagnoses were confirmed upon initial medical assessment (proportion of agreement 0.976, 95% CI: 0.953–0.999; KAPPA= 0.952). Other diagnoses were identified in 5 cases in which 3 were head or neck injury other than concussion and 2 were concussions with an additional diagnosis. In one case a ‘red flag’ was identified by the physician (increasing headache), leading to brain imaging. Of the 4 cases of disagreement, 3 were considered at low risk of complication and only one presented a higher risk.

Conclusion A high level of agreement between detection and physician diagnosis was observed. One situation associated with a higher risk of complication resulted from failure to review the SCAT5 ‘red flags’ in a situation of assessment that was not ‘immediate or on-field’. This may inform adjustments to the SCAT5 terminology and support further research on the efficient use of medical resources.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.