Article Text

Download PDFPDF
2.24 Measuring acute effects of concussion on the child SCAT5 compared to individual baseline assessments
  1. Patricia Kelshaw1,
  2. Cook Nathan2,
  3. Iverson Grant2,
  4. Cortes Nelson3,
  5. Hacherl Samantha3,
  6. Erdman Nicholas3,
  7. Caswell Amanda3,
  8. Caswell Shane3
  1. 1Department of Kinesiology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
  2. 2Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School; Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital; and MasGeneral Hospital for Children Sports Concussion Program, Boston, MA, USA
  3. 3Sports Medicine Assessment, Research and Testing Laboratory, ACHIEVES Project, George Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA

Abstract

Objective To measure the ultra-acute effects of sport-related concussion in children using the Child SCAT5.

Design A within-subjects prospective study comparing baseline preseason Child SCAT5 scores to post-injury scores obtained immediately following injury on the sideline. Certified athletic trainers administered the Child SCAT5 during baseline preseason assessments and on the sideline following a sport-related concussion.

Setting Middle school sports within a large public-school division in Virginia, USA participating in the George Mason University’s Advancing Healthcare Initiatives for Underserved Students (ACHIEVES) Project.

Participants Forty-two middle school age children (ages 11–13, M=12.5, SD=0.7; 38.1% girls, 61.9% boys).

Outcome Measures The Child SCAT5 is comprised of the following scores: Symptoms; Symptom Severity; Standardized Assessment of Concussion-Child Version (SAC-C), including immediate memory, digits backwards, concentration, and delayed recall; and the Modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS).

Main Results Children endorsed more symptoms [baseline: Mean=6.5±6.2 vs. post-injury: 9.1±5.7; p=.01, effect size (r)=-.43] and greater symptom severity [10.0±10.6 vs. 14.7±12.3; p=.01, r=-.39] acutely following injury. They also performed worse on the mBESS following injury [total errors: 5.8±3.8 vs. 8.5±5.4; p=.01, r=-.57, tandem stance: 1.4±1.7 vs. 2.5±2.6; p=.01, r=-.53, and single leg stance: 4.6±2.8 vs. 5.8±3.2; p=.01, r=-.51)]. There were no statistically significant differences on any cognitive scores.

Conclusions Immediately following concussion, children endorsed more symptoms, greater symptoms severity, and performed more poorly on the mBESS. They did not perform more poorly on the cognitive testing compared to their preseason baseline scores on the SAC-C.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.