Background Injuries are common in youth soccer, of which ankle injuries form a significant proportion. However, there is a lack of prospective data on the epidemiology and nature of these injuries.
Aim To prospectively study the incidence of ankle injuries in three Football Association (FA) academies, with particular emphasis on severe injuries and factors associated with increased injury rate.
Design Descriptive epidemiology study.
Methods All 419 players within three FA youth academies during the 2007–2008 season were included, between under 9 and under 18 age groups. Ankle injuries causing a loss of more than 48 h training were studied, along with the setting and mechanism of injury, the diagnosis, time to rehabilitate, any investigations and surgical treatment. The incidence of injury per 1000 h exposure in match, training and in total was calculated.
Results A total of 56 (incidence 14%) new ankle injuries were identified during this 1-year study period. Twenty-six (46%) of these occurred in competition, 24 (43%) were by contact, and eight (14%) had a severe injury diagnosed. The incidence was higher in the competitive setting. Ten injuries (18%) missed more than 6 weeks' training. Of these, seven were diagnosed as ‘sprain’ or ‘strain,’ of whom only three had been further investigated. There was a significant relationship between injury incidence and age group for total and match exposure, but not for training exposure.
Conclusions The incidence of ankle injury in youth soccer is higher in competition, and increases with age in competition. 17.5% of ankle injuries missed more than 6 weeks' training, but the authors found a subgroup of players with delay in returning to sport in whom there was no further investigation to establish the diagnosis. This group may harbour occult injury to the chondral surfaces, and earlier investigation could minimise secondary joint damage in this ‘at risk’ age group.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by Bath University.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.