Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
What strategies can be used to effectively reduce the risk of concussion in sport?
  1. Carolyn A Emery1,
  2. Amanda M Black1,
  3. Ash Kolstad1,
  4. German Martinez1,
  5. Alberto Nettel-Aguirre1,
  6. Lars Engebretsen2,3,4,
  7. Karen Johnston5,6,
  8. James Kissick7,8,9,
  9. David Maddocks10,
  10. Charles Tator11,12,
  11. Mark Aubry13,14,15,
  12. Jiří Dvorák16,17,
  13. Shinji Nagahiro18,
  14. Kathryn Schneider1
  1. 1Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  2. 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  3. 3Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Oslo, Norway
  4. 4Medical and Scientific Department, International Olympic Committee (IOC), Lausanne, Switzerland
  5. 5Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  6. 6Concussion Management Program Athletic Edge Sports Medicine, Ontario, Canada
  7. 7Carleton University Sport Medicine Centre, Ontario, Canada
  8. 8Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  9. 9International Paralympic Committee Medical Committee
  10. 10Perry Maddocks Trollope Lawyers
  11. 11Canadian Concussion Centre, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Ontario, Canada
  12. 12Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  13. 13Ottawa Sport Medicine Centre, Ontario, Canada
  14. 14International Ice Hockey Federation
  15. 15IOC Medical Commission Games Group
  16. 16Department of Neurology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  17. 17Schulthess Clinic Zurich
  18. 18Department of Neurosurgery, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan
  1. Correspondence to Dr Carolyn A Emery, Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, Faculty of Kinesiology and Departments of Pediatrics and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N1N4, Canada; caemery{at}


Aim or objective To examine the effectiveness of concussion prevention strategies in reducing concussion risk in sport.

Design Systematic review according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines.

Data sources Eleven electronic databases searched and hand-search of references from selected studies.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies The following were the study inclusion criteria: (1) contained original human research data; (2) investigated an outcome of concussion or head impact; (3) evaluated a concussion prevention intervention; (4) included sport participants; (5) analytical study designand (6) peer-reviewed. The following were the exclusion criteria: (1) review articles, case series or case studies and (2) not in English.

Results The studies selected (n=48) provided evidence related to protective gear (helmets, headgear, mouthguards) (n=25), policy and rule changes (n=13) and other interventions (training, education, facilities) (n=10). Meta-analyses demonstrate a combined effect of a 70% reduction (incidence rate ratio (IRR)=0.3 (95% CI: 0.22 to 0.41)) in concussion risk in youth ice hockey leagues where policy disallows body checking, and the point estimate (IRR=0.8 (95% CI: 0.6 to 1.1)) suggests a protective effect of mouthguards in contact and collision sport (basketball, ice hockey, rugby).

Summary/conclusions Highlights include a protective effect of helmets in skiing/snowboarding and the effectiveness of policy eliminating body checking in youth ice hockey. Future research should examine mouthguards in contact sport, football helmet padding, helmet fit in collision sport, policy limiting contact practice in youth football, rule enforcement to reduce head contact in ice hockey and soccer, ice surface size and board/glass flexibility in ice hockey and training strategies targeting intrinsic risk factors (eg, visual training).

Systematic review registration PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016039162

  • concussion
  • prevention
  • sport Injury

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Contributors CAE was responsible for the conception and design of the systematic review, analysis and interpretation, drafting of the article, provided final approval and is the guarantor of the work; AMB contributed to the design of the systematic review, analysis and interpretation. AN-A conducted the meta-analyses and contributed to the interpretation. AMB, AK, CAE, GM contributed to the article search and selection process. AMB, AK, CAE, GM, KJ, LE, JK, DM, CT contributed to the risk of bias assessment. All authors contributed to the final systematic review plan (PROSPERO) and reviewed the article critically and provided final approval.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.