Article Text

Applying ethical standards to guide shared decision-making with youth athletes
  1. Clare L Ardern1,2,
  2. Hege Grindem3,
  3. Guri Ranum Ekås4,5,6,
  4. Romain Seil7,8,
  5. Michael McNamee9
  1. 1Division of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
  2. 2School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
  3. 3Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
  4. 4Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  5. 5Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre (OSTRC), Norwegian School of Sport Science, Oslo, Norway
  6. 6Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  7. 7Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
  8. 8Sports Medicine Research Laboratory, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg
  9. 9College of Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Clare L Ardern, Division of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping 581 83, Sweden; clare.ardern{at}

Statistics from

Despite the vast quantity of information available to patients, parents and clinicians, high-quality information and knowledge remains in relatively short supply.1 The benefits of an active lifestyle are incontrovertible. However, youth athletes have substantial risk for sports-related injuries to the musculoskeletal system and the brain.2 3 These potential dangers are known to clinicians who are helping youth athletes and their parents make sound decisions about injury management and sports participation. In the face of these challenges, how does the clinician fulfil his or her duty of care to youth athletes?

The aim of this editorial is to illustrate how different ethical standards can help guide better shared decisions in sports medicine clinical practice. Youth athletes are a particularly vulnerable group because their life plans are still developing. Adding to this complexity is an increasing trend towards professionalisation in youth sport. When arriving at a decision in a clinical dilemma, one or several ethical standards may help the decision-making team evaluate if a decision is ethically justifiable. The 2018 International Olympic Committee consensus on paediatric ACL injury4 outlined six ethical standards (box 1) that may apply to different situations in sports medicine clinical practice.

Box 1

Six ethical standards that can apply to sports medicine clinical scenarios

  1. Best interests5: what is in the youth athlete’s best long-term interests.

  2. Harm principle6: a threshold below which the clinician should not acquiesce to a parent-led …

View Full Text

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.