Article Text

Set-piece approach for medical teams managing emergencies in sport: introducing the FIFA Poster for Emergency Action Planning (PEAP)
  1. Michael Patterson1,
  2. Jonny Gordon2,
  3. Stephen H Boyce3,
  4. Sarah Lindsay4,
  5. Dexter Seow5,
  6. Andreas Serner6,
  7. Kevin Thomson7,
  8. Graeme Jones2,
  9. Andrew Massey6
  1. 1Consultant in Intensive Care & Emergency Medicine, Chief Medical Officer, Venues, Events & Emergency Care, Football Association, London, UK
  2. 2Medical Department, Scottish Football Association, Glasgow, UK
  3. 3Sport Medicine, Sports Institute of Scotland, Glasgow, UK
  4. 4Liverpool Football Club, Liverpool, UK
  5. 5National University Health System, Singapore
  6. 6Medical Department, Federation Internationale de Football Association, Zurich, Switzerland
  7. 7Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Campus, Glasgow, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Andrew Massey, Medical and Anti Doping Department, Federation Internationale de Football Association, 8044 Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland; andrew.massey{at}fifa.org

Statistics from Altmetric.com

‘Does your colleague know what to do on the pitch in case of a medical emergency? Do you?’ When traumatic and non-traumatic emergencies in football (soccer) occur, it is imperative that the healthcare professionals responsible for players are trained and equipped to recognise and provide appropriate care.1

To support and promote a consistent level of emergency medical care on the football field, reduce errors and limit human errors, the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) proposes a standardised protocol for medical teams managing emergencies in sport: the Poster for Emergency Action Planning (PEAP).2

The FIFA PEAP (figure 1) illustrates a process by which medical teams organise themselves to deliver prioritised care in emergency scenarios and minimises the risks that are inherent when working in the complex and often publicly viewed prehospital environment of competitive football. By linking key clinical interventions with predetermined roles, the PEAP helps teams manage the challenging human factors inherent in a time-critical emergency on the field of play. Importantly, the FIFA PEAP moves away from the more traditional reactive team dynamics to a more proactive team preparation model.

Figure 1

The FIFA Poster for Emergency Action Planning. The names of the person responsible should be entered into the coloured spaces. Each required role (colour) is described in detail in table 1. Please see (online supplemental figure 2) for more detail on the 2021 FIFA emergency bag. AED, automatic external defibrillator; FIFA, Fédération Internationale de Football Association.

Table 1

Team members and roles for the FIFA emergency action plan

Proactive team behaviour: the set-piece

Regardless of where the emergency takes place, the clinical elements for recognising and managing a medical emergency or trauma remain the same. The football terminology of a ‘set-piece’ has been borrowed to describe the optimal process—where a team practises for a predicted scenario, with each member designated a role to perform and the accumulation of these roles leads to the goal.

Set-piece thinking permits optimal team performance by allowing each individual to remain task-focused without distraction. A team leader or ‘captain’ of the medical team should be predesignated and is ultimately responsible for coordinating the emergency response. This role can be assumed initially by the first responder (often the team doctor) who would perform the initial on-field assessment and begin management, before moving to a more hands-off role to coordinate the response, or hand over these responsibilities to a pre determined team leader (when they arrive on scene). Regardless of the clinical scenario, the process for the emergency response should not change, so time-critical and life-threatening clinical issues (such as sudden cardiac arrest or thoracic trauma) are not missed due to the prioritisation of more eye-catching issues (such as angulated fractures).

This scripted and reproducible process necessitates team practice and scenario-based training by the medical staff and designated responders to minimise stress and improve efficiency when called into action.3

Task allocation

One of the major challenges in providing medical care for football is the inconsistency in resources available within venues. The FIFA PEAP aims to add a consistent approach that can be adopted by most multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) and defines the minimal clinical resources and associated skills required for each role.

The PEAP is designed for all stakeholders in football, in both competitions and training. It is an umbrella process that is equally applicable to venues with already established high-functioning emergency systems and those with more moderate resources. To achieve this, we have placed emphasis on the key interventions required to resuscitate and stabilise a patient and the skills required to deliver these procedures. This focus allows the integration of clinicians with emergency competencies (such as doctors, paramedics and nurses) and allied health professionals with other skills (such as physiotherapists, athletic trainers, sports therapists and first aiders) into a MDT.

Practising to perfection

Within the PEAP, roles are allocated and practised prior to the deployment of the team so when an emergency takes place, team members are already aware of their role and responsibilities in the process. These are colour coded and represent the positions and responsibilities each member should take during a scenario—as described in figure 1. Each club may have personnel to fill each of these roles and practise their emergency response together before the start of the season. In some circumstances, the visiting team may require personnel from the home team to fill all roles. This should be determined before match day and role allocation should take place at the Prematch Medical Meeting (suggest 1 hour prior to kick-off) or in a pretraining briefing. As part of adopting the PEAP, teams should introduce time for this key communication or so-called ‘medical timeout’ into their regular preactivity routine.

Creating strong team communication

A synchronised, well-practised set-piece allows teams to work efficiently and without getting in each other’s way. However, the task-focused element of most team members’ roles places increasing importance on communication and the hands-off oversight of the team leader.

Communication within the team is key, allowing team members to feedback through the team leader who provides situational awareness and coordinates the set-piece. The team should practice closed-loop communication where the team member alerts the rest of the team via the team leader when each task is delivered.

It is inevitable that team communication and performance will be challenged by stressful, time-critical medical emergencies, and so the PEAP is designed as a reference document for use during team activity. All roles and communication channels should refer back to the FIFA PEAP as a tool to maintain clear team direction, organisation and leadership in times of stress.

Conclusion

A medical emergency in football is a challenging and stressful situation for any clinician. To provide the most efficient response, to best prioritise care and optimise the medical team’s performance, we recommend moving away from reactive team dynamics to a proactive team preparation model. The FIFA PEAP provides a structure by which any medical team supporting the field can deliver a reproducible system using a set-piece process to ensure optimal player care when a medical emergency presents itself.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Ethics approval

This study does not involve human participants.

References

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Footnotes

  • Twitter @andy_massey

  • Contributors All authors contributed equally to the formation of this manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.