You are here

  • Home
  • Online First
  • Infographic. Workload in throwing dominant sports: an infographic summary

Article Text

Article menu

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Infographic
Infographic. Workload in throwing dominant sports: an infographic summary
  1. Jason L Zaremski1,
  2. Marissa Pazik2,
  3. Jennifer Duncan3,
  4. MaryBeth Horodyski2
  1. 1Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
  2. 2Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
  3. 3Sport and Exercise, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jason L Zaremski, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; zaremjl{at}ufl.edu

https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-106147

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Substantial interest in the concept of workload and its applications to training and injury prevention programmes is evident in the literature. The majority of the published data regarding workload surrounds lower extremity-based sports involving running activities such as track and field events as well as soccer. However, there has been an increased interest in the workload concept related to throwing and overhead sports in recent years. In particular, cricket, baseball, softball, volleyball, water polo, handball and lacrosse have been studied.1 2 Unfortunately, as a result of …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Twitter @zaremjl, @JenniferDunca10

    • Contributors All authors contributed to the development of this Infographic for the 2023 AMSSM BJSM special issue.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.