TY - JOUR T1 - The associations between participation in certain sports and lower mortality are not explained by affluence and other socioeconomic factors JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine JO - Br J Sports Med SP - 1514 LP - 1515 DO - 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097411 VL - 51 IS - 21 AU - Emmanuel Stamatakis AU - Paul Kelly AU - Sylvia Titze AU - Zeljko Pedisic AU - Adrian Bauman AU - Charlie Foster AU - Mark Hamer AU - Melvyn Hillsdon AU - Pekka Oja Y1 - 2017/11/01 UR - http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/51/21/1514.abstract N2 - Our recent paper1 examined the type-specific associations between sports and all cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. Among the wide media attention,2 CNN reported our finding as ‘Swimming, aerobics, racquet sports slash risk of death’3 and those three sports that showed the largest reductions in mortality risk (as indicated by the HR value).4 Running and football (soccer)/rugby5 showed limited beneficial associations with mortality. While it was beyond the capacity and scope of our research to undertake comparisons between different sports and explain why these three specific types of sports were associated with the largest reductions in risk, much of the media commentary2 was consumed with aetiological explanations3 5–7 of the beneficial associations that participation in certain sports conferred. On the other hand, an alternative explanation is that our findings of lower mortality did not reflect the health attributes of the examined sports but, instead, they were related to socioeconomic characteristics of the participants of certain sports. For example, as football is perceived … ER -