%0 Journal Article %A Chantel L Rabusin %A Hylton B Menz %A Jodie A McClelland %A Angela M Evans %A Peter Malliaras %A Sean I Docking %A Karl B Landorf %A James M Gerrard %A Shannon E Munteanu %T Efficacy of heel lifts versus calf muscle eccentric exercise for mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy (HEALTHY): a randomised trial %D 2021 %R 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101776 %J British Journal of Sports Medicine %P 486-492 %V 55 %N 9 %X Objective(s) To compare the efficacy of in-shoe heel lifts to calf muscle eccentric exercise in reducing pain and improving function in mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy.Methods This was a parallel-group randomised superiority trial at a single centre (La Trobe University Health Sciences Clinic, Discipline of Podiatry, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia). One hundred participants (52 women and 48 men, mean age 45.9, SD 9.4 years) with clinically diagnosed and ultrasonographically confirmed mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy were randomly allocated to either a (1) heel lifts (n=50) or (2) eccentric exercise (n=50) group. The primary outcome measure was the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire at 12 weeks. Differences between groups were analysed using intention to treat with analysis of covariance.Results There was 80% follow-up of participants (n=40 per group) at 12 weeks. The mean VISA-A score improved by 26.0 points (95% CI 19.6 to 32.4) in the heel lifts group and by 17.4 points (95% CI 9.5 to 25.3) in the eccentric exercise group. On average, there was a between-group difference in favour of the heel lifts for the VISA-A (adjusted mean difference 9.6, 95% CI 1.8 to 17.4, p=0.016), which approximated, but did not meet our predetermined minimum important difference of 10 points.Conclusion In adults with mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy, heel lifts were more effective than calf muscle eccentric exercise in reducing pain and improving function at 12 weeks. However, there is uncertainty in the estimate of effect for this outcome and patients may not experience a clinically worthwhile difference between interventions.Trial registration number ACTRN12617001225303.Data are available on reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplementary information. The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available on request in the La Trobe University Figshare repository: https://latrobe.figshare.com/. %U https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/bjsports/55/9/486.full.pdf