PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - S T Aydog AU - O Tetik AU - H A Demirel AU - M N Doral TI - Differences in sole arch indices in various sports AID - 10.1136/bjsm.2003.011478 DP - 2005 Feb 01 TA - British Journal of Sports Medicine PG - e5--e5 VI - 39 IP - 2 4099 - http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/39/2/e5.short 4100 - http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/39/2/e5.full SO - Br J Sports Med2005 Feb 01; 39 AB - Background: There are controversial data about the relation between foot morphology and athletic injuries of the lower extremity. Studies in soldiers have shown some relationship, whereas those involving athletes have not shown any significant relationship. The reason for these differences is not clear. Objective: To determine the effect of various sports on sole arch indices (AIs). Method: A total of 116 elite male athletes (24 soccer players, 23 wrestlers, 19 weightlifters, 30 handball players, and 20 gymnasts) and 30 non-athletic men were included in this cross sectional study. Images of both soles were taken in a podoscope and transferred to a computer using a digital still camera. AIs were calculated from the stored images. Results: The AI of the right sole of the gymnasts was significantly lower than that of the soccer players, wrestlers, and non-athletic controls (p<0.01). The AI of the right sole of the wrestlers was significantly higher than that of the soccer players, handball players, weightlifters, gymnasts, and non-athletic controls (p<0.03). The AI of the left sole of the gymnasts was significantly lower than that of the wrestlers and non-athletic controls (p<0.001). The AI of the left sole of the wrestlers was significantly higher than that of the soccer players, handball players, and gymnasts (p<0.007). The AI of both soles in handball players was significantly lower than those of the non-athletic subjects (p  =  0.049). The correlation between the AI of the left and right foot was poor in the soccer players, handball players, and wrestlers (r  =  0.31, 0.69, and 0.56 respectively), but was high in the gymnasts, weightlifters, and non-athletic controls (r  =  0.96, 0.88, and 0.80 respectively). Conclusion: The AIs of the gymnasts and wrestlers were significantly different from those of other sportsmen studied, and those of the gymnasts and handball players were significantly different from those of non-athletic controls.