Table 3

Summary of significant and non-significant injury risk factors by quantity, quality and level of evidence

Level of evidence12345
abcab: True experimentalb: Quasi experimentalb: Prospective cohortb: Retrospective cohortcab: Case–controlc: Cross-sectional
Risk factorSIGNOTSIGNOTSIGNOTSIGNOTSIGNOTSIGNOTTotal
ModifiableAnthropometry  3 (7–10)2 (8–10)5 (2–8)8 (6–8)18
LE alignment  1 (11)1 (11)1 (5)3
LE joint ROM  2 (8–9)3 (7–10)2 (4–11)1 (11)4 (6–9)6 (2–9)18
Lumbopelvic control  1 (7)1 (7)1 (9)1 (9)4
Aerobic capacity  1 (16)1 (7)2
LE flexibility  1 (6)1 (11)2
LE strength  1 (10)1 (11)1 (11)3
Power  1 (16)1 (10)2
Balance  2 (10)1 (11)1 (8)1 (8)5
Stress  1 (8)2 (6–7)3
Perfectionism  1 (6)1
Coping skills  1 (12)1 (8)2
Mood  1 (7)1
Eating attitudes, RDA  1 (10)1 (7)1 (7)2 (6–9)2 (6–9)7
Vitamin D  1 (7)1
Alignment during plié  1 (8)1 (11)1 (4)3
Jump landing  3 (8–9)2 (8–9)5
Dance exposure  2 (10–11)2 (10–11)1 (7)4 (2–8)6 (2–12)15
Footwear  1 (3)1
Non-modifiableAge  1 (9)3 (8–10)1 (11)2 (5–8)5 (2–12)12
Sex  1 (9)3 (8–11)1 (6)3 (5–12)8
Skeletal maturation  1 (8)1 (8)1 (7)3
Menstrual health  2 (10)2 (8–10)1 (11)5
Previous injury  3 (6–10)2 (7–10)1 (11)1 (9)2 (7–9)9
  • Cell values represent the number of studies for each risk factor (range of Downs and Black scores).

  • Levels of evidence are based on the modified OCEBM 2009 model. As per study exclusion criteria, systematic reviews (1a, 2a, 3a), case series (4) and opinion-based papers (5) were not included (shown in dark grey).

  • LE, lower extremity; NOT, not significant finding; OCEBM, Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine; RDA, recommended daily allowance; ROM, range of motion; SIG, significant finding.