Table 1

Sensitivity analysis of glucosamine for pain at short term

SupplementVariableNumber of studies (patients)SMD (95% CI)I², %Meta-regression
ES differencep Value
Glucosamine
Randomisation
 Low risk6 (732)−0.2 (−0.4 to 0.1)51
 Unclear4 (314)−0.6 (−1.3 to 0.1)84−0.3 (−0.8 to 0.2)0.27
Allocation concealment
 Low risk3 (525)0.0 (−0.1 to 0.2)6
 Unclear7 (521)−0.5 (−0.8 to −0.1)70−0.4 (−0.9 to 0.0)0.06
Blinding
 Low risk3 (556)−0.0 (−0.2 to 0.2)24
 Unclear6 (437)−0.4 (−0.9 to −0.0)76−0.3 (−0.8 to 0.2)0.20
 High risk1 (53)−0.8 (−1.3 to −0.2)0−0.7 (−1.6 to 0.1)0.10
Incomplete outcome
 Low risk6 (839)−0.1 (−0.3 to 0.1)55
 Unclear2 (78)−1.0 (−1.5 to −0.6)0−1.0 (−1.5 to −0.4)0.001
 High risk2 (129)−0.3 (−0.6 to 0.1)0−0.2 (−0.7 to 0.3)0.35
Selective reporting
 Low risk8 (968)−0.1 (−0.3 to 0.1)48
 High risk2 (78)−1.0 (−1.5 to −0.6)0−0.9 (−1.5 to −0.4)0.001
Other bias (funding)
 Low risk5 (824)0.0 (−0.1 to 0.2)0
 Unclear4 (202)−0.7 (−1.0 to −0.4)0−0.7 (−1.0 to −0.4)<0.001
 High risk1 (20)−1.4 (−2.4 to −0.4)0−1.4 (−2.4 to −0.4)0.005
Study sample size
 Large3 (628)0.1 (−0.1 to 0.2)0
 Small7 (418)−0.5 (−0.8 to −0.2)57−0.5 (−0.9 to −0.2)0.003
OA site
 Knee OA9 (824)−0.3 (−0.6 to −0.1)70
 Hip OA1 (222)0.1 (−0.2 to 0.3)00.4 (−0.3 to 1.2)0.28
  • ES, effect size.; I², measures of heterogeneity; OA, osteoarthritis; SMD, standardised mean difference.