CPG AGREE II domain scores and quality assessment (%)
Title | 1. Scope and purpose | 2. Stakeholder involvement | 3. Rigour of development | 4. Clarity of presentation | 5. Applicability | 6. Editorial independence | Overall assessment | Quality (high/low) |
Osteoarthritis | ||||||||
AAOS – knee osteoarthritis42 | 94 | 57 | 87 | 78 | 29 | 81 | 78 | High |
ACR – hand, hip and knee osteoarthritis70 | 69 | 33 | 53 | 67 | 7 | 22 | 44 | Low |
EULAR – hip and knee osteoarthritis41 | 80 | 67 | 56 | 76 | 19 | 50 | 61 | High |
ESCEO – knee osteoarthritis39 | 65 | 26 | 37 | 61 | 21 | 67 | 44 | Low |
ESCEO – knee osteoarthritis with updated algorithm of pharmacological interventions40 | 63 | 20 | 10 | 63 | 11 | 0 | 28 | Low |
KNGF – physiotherapy hip/knee osteoarthritis71 | 78 | 63 | 55 | 83 | 46 | 11 | 61 | Low |
MaHTAS – osteoarthritis34 | 80 | 56 | 43 | 54 | 39 | 39 | 44 | Low |
NICE – osteoarthritis38 | 85 | 80 | 90 | 94 | 88 | 78 | 89 | High |
OARSI – knee osteoarthritis43 | 74 | 63 | 55 | 70 | 4 | 78 | 67 | High |
Ottawa – osteoarthritis obese/overweight47 | 89 | 56 | 58 | 50 | 28 | 28 | 56 | Low |
Ottawa – patient education osteoarthritis48 | 72 | 54 | 53 | 39 | 13 | 6 | 33 | Low |
VA/DoD – hip and knee osteoarthritis72 | 85 | 50 | 60 | 78 | 25 | 3 | 56 | Low |
Low back pain | ||||||||
APTA – low back pain73 | 78 | 50 | 45 | 67 | 29 | 3 | 44 | Low |
CCGPP – low back pain44 | 67 | 54 | 60 | 39 | 25 | 61 | 44 | High |
BPS – low back pain/radicular pain74 | 56 | 48 | 8 | 57 | 21 | 25 | 17 | Low |
Cheng et al – low back pain.75* | 41 | 15 | 26 | 39 | 17 | 0 | 17 | Low |
Colorado DLE WC – low back pain49 | 70 | 33 | 63 | 48 | 31 | 22 | 28 | Low |
ICSI – low back pain76 | 78 | 46 | 41 | 72 | 51 | 72 | 56 | Low |
NASS – lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy37 | 72 | 33 | 51 | 48 | 10 | 33 | 39 | Low |
NASS – degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis35 | 76 | 26 | 48 | 44 | 8 | 39 | 39 | Low |
NASS – degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis36 | 81 | 30 | 51 | 44 | 25 | 42 | 39 | Low |
NICE – low back pain and sciatica in over 16 s23 | 89 | 78 | 85 | 93 | 83 | 72 | 89 | High |
TOP – low back pain77 | 72 | 31 | 17 | 74 | 19 | 0 | 33 | Low |
Shoulder | ||||||||
DOA – subacromial pain59 | 78 | 26 | 28 | 48 | 11 | 3 | 22 | Low |
Eubank et al – rotator cuff58* | 74 | 37 | 33 | 46 | 25 | 22 | 39 | Low |
Hopman et al – rotator cuff46* | 87 | 74 | 73 | 78 | 50 | 56 | 67 | High |
I.S.Mu.L.T – rotator cuff tears57 | 43 | 17 | 19 | 35 | 10 | 0 | 28 | Low |
WSDL&I – shoulder78 | 74 | 44 | 20 | 37 | 24 | 8 | 22 | Low |
Neck | ||||||||
CCA – neck pain50 | 63 | 37 | 55 | 50 | 10 | 31 | 44 | Low |
Colorado DLE WC – cervical spine injury51 | 81 | 37 | 57 | 52 | 35 | 25 | 39 | Low |
OPTIMa – neck pain45 | 94 | 67 | 80 | 91 | 38 | 50 | 67 | High |
SIMFER – neck pain79 | 46 | 30 | 15 | 37 | 7 | 0 | 22 | Low |
Knee | ||||||||
Barton et al – P-F pain80* | 69 | 24 | 56 | 61 | 25 | 69 | 61 | Low |
Musculoskeletal | ||||||||
ACE – musculoskeletal injuries81 | 37 | 28 | 17 | 39 | 11 | 8 | 17 | Low |
*First author given where there is no stated organisation.
AAOS, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; ACR, American College of Rheumatology; AGREE, Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation; APTA, Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association; BPS, British Pain Society; CCA, Canadian Chiropractic Association; CCGPP, Council on Chiropractic Guidelines and Practice Parameters; Colorado DLE WC, Colorado Department of Labour and Employment Workers Compensation; CPGs, clinical practice guidelines; DOA, Dutch Orthopaedic Association; ESCEO, European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis; EULAR, European League Against Rheumatism; I.S.Mu.L.T., Italian Society of Muscle Ligaments and Tendons; ICSI, Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement; KNGF, Royal Dutch Society of Physiotherapy; MaHTAS, Malaysia Health Technology Assessment Section Medical Development Division, Ministry of Health; NASS, North American Spine Society; NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; OARSI, Osteoarthritis Research Society International; OPTIMa, Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management Collaboration; Ottawa, Ottawa Panel; P-F, patellofemoral; SIMFER, the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine; TOP, Toward Optimized Practice; VA/DOD, Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defence; WSDL&I, Washington State Department of Labour and Industries.